Talk:1885 Atlantic hurricane season
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Discussion
Whats the point of this banner if no one discusses about the article?Storm05 17:54, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- There are so many articles we can't work on them all at once. Hink and I have been going through the articles one at a time improving them. Eventually we'll get back to this one. Please stop complaining about stub articles; instead of complaining and adding new stub articles you should be working to improve the stub articles that we have. — jdorje (talk) 20:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1885 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 06:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: HurricaneZeta (talk · contribs) 21:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
I'll review this HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 21:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
| GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
|---|
|
|
Overall: |
Comments
- Earwig's copyvio detector gives a 52.5% with the HURDAT but most of it is reused phrases like "made landfall" and completely unrelated. HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 21:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Prose check came back good, did/am doing some minor fixes myself HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 20:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Finished spot check that I started yesterday HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 20:46, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

