Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kazakhstan

RfC Should Kazakhstan article names follow current transliteration rules?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To keep it short:--No, at least as of now.∯WBGconverse 05:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should Kazakhstan article names follow current transliteration rules, even where the WP:COMMONNAME found in English language texts uses a differing transliteration?

Recent move requests are using justifications such as "native Kazakh ... (Cyrillic name) is transliterated ... (Latin text)," and "Kazakhstan is also switching to Latin script as well so that makes it written ...".

Batternut (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Context

Current moves under discussion are Balkhash (city) to "Balqash", Akmola Region to "Aqmola Region" and Ak Orda Presidential Palace to "Aqorda Presidential Palace". Other recent attempted moves have been Stepnogorsk to "Stepnogor", Balqash Airport to "Balqash Airport", Arkalyk to "Arqalyq", Zhibek Zholy Street (Almaty) to "Jibek Joly Street (Almaty)", and Nurly Zhol to "Nurly Jol".

See Kazakh language for details of Kazakhstan's switch to Latin script. When the switch was announced a proposal to move Kazakhstan to "Qazaqstan" (archived here) was rejected.

Batternut (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

  • No - we should stick to the spelling currently found in English language reliable sources, per policy WP:COMMONNAME, and avoid WP:Crystalball gazing. Batternut (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning No. We had a similar discussion for Ukraine, which is a bit difficult to me now to find. Ukrainian uses the Cyrillic script, but the transliteration rules are pretty straightforward. The outcome was that most Ukrainian localities (the identified exceptions were Kiev, Odessa, Chernobyl, and, later as a RM, Gurzuf) have no established Enlish language names, and for them the transliteration must be applied. I guess the situation is similar to Kazakhstan, most localities have no established names, and we must come with the list of exceptions and for the rest follow the Latin Kazakh alphabet. However, this should not be a permission for indiscriminate undiscussed moves (indeed, users who repeatedly moved Ukrainian articles without discussion have been blocked), and where an established name in English exists it must be used irrespectively of what spelling Kazakhstan chooses to use in Kazakh. Note that in the discussion of Talk:Qaraghandy the spelling was invented by discussion participants, which I personally find absolutely unacceptable.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Apologies for my unnotified page movement, I do think we should stick to WP:COMMONNAME. However, I can highly assure you that the names of the articles I moved have no complete common name and show different good amount of results when written in different language transliteration. I have no real intentions of changing articles with common name such as Kazakhstan to Qazaqstan or Nazarbayev to Nazarbaev since these are the names that I admit, are common. Shadowzpaev (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Blocked sock. Dekimasuよ! 20:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. As this source points out, the transition to this alphabet is only just beginning in Kazakhstan and it is not reflected in English sources. I agree with User:Shadowzpaev's "no common name" argument in principle, but it's too early for wholesale moves based on an alphabet that's only been in place since February (and which replaced another one only finalised in 2017). Wikipedia still uses non-standard transliterations for Azeri nearly 30 years after its switch to the Latin alphabet. —  AjaxSmack  02:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Summoned by bot) No. As per WP:COMMONNAME. Borsoka (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral. I have a comment in response to Ymblanter; It is common in Kazakhstan for highway signs to have English versions for towns. (I don't know if this should be a factor in our decisions, which is why I am neutral -- I just thought it might be relevant). Kdammers (talk) 09:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

  • To assume that last year's decision to switch the preferred script for Kazakh to Latin will result in the newer transliteration becoming the dominant spelling would be WP:Crystalball gazing (Wikipedia does not predict the future). Batternut (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • It depends, if there is a very fair amount of Kazakh names about Kazakhstan articles that are mentioned in English language without a fully established WP:COMMONNAME then they should be changed. However if articles like Lake Balkhash, then they should remain the same because many English sources and even maps with Kazakh named cities show its non-Kazakh name. Igor1383 (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Blocked sock. Dekimasuよ! 20:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Igor1383: your "fully established common name" test is expressed by WP:TRANSLITERATE as situations of "too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage". So what number of sources might we consider as "too few"? I think most or all of the above cases have over a hundred sources using the current spellings. Batternut (talk)

17:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shadowzpaev: you assured us that the names of the articles I moved have no complete common name, but they do! One example, "Stepnogorsk" gets about 3,740 book search hits whereas "Stepnogor" gets only 11 hits. At scholar.google.co.uk "Stepnogorsk" gets about 494 hits whereas "Stepnogor" gets only 4 hits! It's the same with the others. Batternut (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RfC on election/referendum naming format

An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Displaying Russian names as footnotes in former Soviet Union locations?

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Soviet_Union#Display_Russian_names_in_footnotes_of_locations_in_the_former_Soviet_Union? for a discussion on whether the Russian names should be put in footnotes in articles about former Soviet Union locations (which existed at the time of the Soviet Union) WhisperToMe (talk) 08:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First women MPs in Kazakhstan

Hello. I'm compiling a list of the first women MPs in each country, but have been unable to find the answer for Kazakhstan. I'm guessing they would have been an early member(s) of the Supreme Soviet of the Kazakh SSR, the Congress of Soviets or the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. If anyone can point me to a definitive source, it would be much appreciated. Cheers, Number 57 17:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rename articles about uezds for consistency

I’m proposing renaming every article in the form of, for example, Akhtyrka Uyezd → Akhtyrka Uezd, to match the spelling of the renamed main article Uezd. Please discuss at talk:Uezd#Rename articles about uezds for consistency. —Michael Z. 22:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible vandalism to First Lady of Kazakhstan

There's a recent edit to the article First Lady of Kazakhstan that looks like it may be vandalism. However, I don't have deep knowledge of the country, so it might just an unsourced yet correct edit. I wanted to raise it to this project where people might have knowledge. After the divorce of current President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, someone named Danny Nakamura is listed as the new First Lady. However, there is no source for this claim, no information in the biographical article about Tokayev about this supposed new First Lady, and no wikilink to an article about Ms. Nakamura. Does anyone know whether this is vandalism or accurate information? Thanks. JamesAM (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it looks like vandalism, and it was unsourced anyway. I have removed it.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization or native Latin script?

WP:KAZAKHNAMES says “For Kazakh language, BGN/PCGN romanization of Kazakh is typically used.” But I notice that the articles on Tokayev and Nazarbayev, and some others, use the Latin Kazakh in the lead instead, in contradiction to the example given there. Is this now the convention in use?

It seems to make sense to use the Kazakh Latin (or should I say Qazaq Latin?).

Shall we update the guideline?  —Michael Z. 05:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not think there is consensus to use Kazakh Latin. In a year or two it would become official, and then romanization would not be needed. Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars involving Kazakhstan

Was wondering if some members of this WikiProject could take a look at List of wars involving Kazakhstan.There are some MOS:COLOR issues (at least in my opinion) that need to be addressed, but the main thing is that there's seems to be an edit war brewing based upon some recent edits that have been made by some SPAs and the edit summaries that were left for them. If someone knowledgeable about the subject matter could take a look and determine the last good stable version of the article, then perhaps the article could be protected and these SPA could instead be encouraged to use the article talk page to discuss things. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I protected the article for two weeks, and some of the edit summaries are not really encouraging. Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few questions about when to use Nur-Sultan vs. Astana

Hi there, I don't know that much about Kazakhstan nor have any connection to the country, but I have been reading Wikipedia and have been finding that several articles still contain "Nur-Sultan" in their titles or body text. Is there a guideline on where to use Nur-Sultan vs. Astana in articles? Specifically, if an event (e.g. election, sports match etc) occurred while the capital's name was Nur-Sultan, do we use Nur-Sultan for that article or do we change that to Astana? Similarly, if something was established while the city was named Nur-Sultan, do we use Nur-Sultan or Astana for that as well? Thanks. Prodraxis (talk) 20:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think this is pretty much as other renamed cities: If an event took place when the name of the city wass Nursultan, it should be as a rule referred to as Nursultan. (Note also that though it was called Astana before and after Nursultan, it was still called Akmolinsk, Tselinograd, and Akmola before Astana). Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russian or Kazakh speaking help wanted regarding an article title

Recently, I have been finding that across multiple wikis (including en.wp), the capital of Kazakhstan is still called Nur-Sultan, not Astana in inappropriate places against WP:MOS guidelines (see User:Prodraxis/Astana for more info). I have recently come across the article Nur-Sultan Zhas Ulan Republican School while looking for examples of such MOS errors to fix. Now, AFAIK a lot of establishments (e.g. Barys Astana) have changed their names from containing Nur-Sultan to containing Astana when the capital was renamed back to Astana, and I want to know if this is the case for the Nur-Sultan Zhas Ulan Republican School article as well. I tried to google some stuff in English, but I couldn't find anything regarding the school's name, and I don't understand any Russian or Kazakh either and I can't read Cyrillic. Can any Russian or Kazakh speakers help out with this? Thanks. Prodraxis (talk) 14:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm, please disregard this message - a few days ago, I decided to move the page's title to Astana Zhas Ulan Republican School partly because other articles were named e.g. Almaty Zhas Ulan Republican School and the naming conventions seemed consistently to put the name of the city in front of "Zhas Ulan Republican School" with regards to these articles. Prodraxis (talk) 15:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Developing Countries WikiContest

Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.

Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.

Kazakhstan is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest, so articles related to it are eligible to be submitted to the contest. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!

Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!

Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 08:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Would anyone be interested in joining a sub project of WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh Figure Skating Championships

I'm not sure if there's anyone here, but I am working on this article, and the available sourcing is atrocious. If anyone has any suggestions for Kazakh media sources (newspaper archives, etc.), please let me know, and thank you in advance! Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The DCWC is back!

The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle
The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle

WikiProject Kazakhstan, the Developing Countries WikiContest will be returning for a second year, and sign-ups are now open! The contest will run from 1 July to 30 September, and the objective remains the same: improve as many articles relating to developing countries as you can to help fight systemic bias on Wikipedia.

In other news, we have a new face on the coordinator team this year: last year's sixth-place finisher, Arconning (talk · contribs)! The coordinators would like to extend a sincere thanks to Ixtal (talk · contribs), who is leaving the team, without whom the contest would not exist. After feedback from contestants last year, the scoring rules are undergoing some modifications; the new rules and a summary of the changes made will be posted to the contest talk page shortly.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page, use the {{@DCWC coordinators}} template, or contact one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove this talk page from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 12:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple merge discussion

A discussion on multiple proposed mergers is ongoing at Outline of Belarus that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Necessary to add here because, in addition, the Article Alert doesn't update the discussion page target. Dege31 (talk) 03:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that Telecommunications in Kazakhstan, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 December 2025 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Murat Bisembin#Requested move 10 January 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Murat Bisembin#Requested move 10 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 13:17, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hello! I stumbled upon a draft, Draft:List of battles involving Kazakhstan and i think i am missing articles and the articles need to be made. Thanks. — The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:2011 President's Cup (tennis) – Men's singles#Requested move 9 February 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2011 President's Cup (tennis) – Men's singles#Requested move 9 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 8rz (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Kazakhstan