Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 30, 2025.

Aleema

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

search shows this refers to multiple unrelated people and fictional characters, none of whom are discussed with enough substance anywhere to warrant a redirect. Delete in favor of search results. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Urgent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm. plicit 23:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget. WP:URGENT (in all caps) leads to Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm as a shortcut. Because of this, I think this redirect's target should go to the same place. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 22:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sexual anomaly

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Sexual anomalies. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dabify with or retarget to sexual anomalies? Skemous (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to sexual anomalies as a standard {{R to plural}} and add a hatnote in the Sexual anomalies article, since "sexual anomaly/anomalies" does seem to be used to refer to paraphilia as well, e.g. here. Plant🌱man (talk) 22:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the linked document, ctrl+g and search "paraphilia" then do the same with "sexual anomaly", if you don't want to read the whole thing (I certainly didn't). Plant🌱man (talk) 22:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Glude

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm talk 21:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no mention at target. Jalen Barks (Woof) 17:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Glude is apparently a NCS artist. There's a section for notable artists, but not for non-notable ones such as Glude, so readers will probably either get confused, or be left wanting more information. Plant🌱man (talk) 22:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

GM LD engine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Hog Farm talk 21:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not mentioned in the target article, and a search does not turn up anything that would be related to the target article. The redirects have no incoming links. --Sable232 (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Toe walley jump

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 9#Toe walley jump

The B

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hog Farm talk 21:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete. I stand by my previous rationale as to why. B (disambiguation) still lists not topics referred to as "The B." GilaMonster536 (talk) 14:08, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Thryduulf. Just because it’s not exclusive to “The B” entries doesn’t mean that a person typing in “The B” won’t perhaps find what they are looking for. Plant🌱man (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning keep per those above, but I would not object to splitting out into a separate disambiguation page if enough uses of this specific formulation are confirmed. BD2412 T 02:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DXIP

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. plicit 23:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:REDLINK is the mentioned?, became a redirect this AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXIP just 1 year later. It should be deleted. --112.207.123.170'Talk to me! 04:29, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:ELDERS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was initially a redirect to the essay "Wikipedia:Respect your elders", but a later discussion moved it to user space, because of being at odds with core principles of Wikipedia (such as that we don't have a hierarchy of editors based on seniority). The redirect is now not needed. It should be either deleted, or retargeted to some Wikipedia page that talks about elders, if there is one. Cambalachero (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 9#Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia