This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Yorkshire Mid‑importance List of busiest railway stations in West Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Isn't this a list of all railway stations in West Yorkshire? Bazonka (talk) 21:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! I think we should relegate this to the top ten for each year, and that's it. Mind you - each year it will consistently be Leeds, then Huddersfield, then Bradford, then the Wakefields, so in essence, is there any point in this article? Should we just delete? I am happy to revamp it with citations, but not if it is unviable. The joy of all things (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As no-one has responded in ten days, I am going to radically change this to be a year-on-year structure with just the top ten. The joy of all things (talk) 10:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]