Talk:Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve
| Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012022326/http://www.fossiliraptor.be/le%20devonien.htm to http://www.fossiliraptor.be/le%20devonien.htm#Géologie
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012021439/http://ncs.drupalgardens.com/devonian/4-famennian-lithostratigraphic-units to http://ncs.drupalgardens.com/devonian/4-famennian-lithostratigraphic-units
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://inpn.mnhn.fr/docs/rnr/FR930008120090525.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Article review
It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The layout of the article is also confusing: what is the Bibliography section and what information is it trying to tell readers? Is this supposed to be after the references, as outlined in MOS:ORDER? Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:56, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Two weeks with no improvements made toward addressing stated concerns. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The layout of the article is also confusing: what is the Bibliography section trying to tell readers? Is this supposed to be after the references, as outlined in MOS:ORDER? Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)