Talk:Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
24.91.126.96 (talk)
No edit summary
24.91.126.96 (talk)
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
== Allegedly ==
== Allegedly ==


Considering that legal proceedings are not over in this case, I think that "who was gang-raped, burned and killed, by American troops." should read "who was allegedly gang-raped, burned and killed, by American troops." Isn't this normal procedure for an ongoing case?
Considering that legal proceedings are not over in this case, I think that "who was gang-raped, burned and killed, by American troops." should read "who was gang-raped, burned and killed, allegedly by American troops." Isn't this normal procedure for an ongoing case?


I already made this change once, and someone changed it back without comment. If you are going to remove it again, please explain why. [[User:24.91.126.96|24.91.126.96]] 23:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I already made this change once, and someone changed it back without comment. If you are going to remove it again, please explain why. [[User:24.91.126.96|24.91.126.96]] 23:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:41, 11 January 2007

WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.

Merge suggestion

Against:

  1. This is an article about an individual. It is in no way less notable than other victims of the Iraq War like Miguel Terrazas. Socafan 23:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Each victim or alleged defendent is warranted a seperate article prime example Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse --Bnguyen 19:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I have withdrawn my "FOR" point. I agree with the above. Abeer Qassim Hamza must be warranted a seperate article, in addition to the main article in place --Mo77787 22:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Anchoress 05:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

revert poorly explained edit -- see talk

Another wikipedian excised an external link with the edit summary -- rv addition of unnecessary link.

I checked out the link they excised. It seemed to be a very useful link, with further links to news articles, showing the timeline of how the press covered the story. I couldn't imagine why the other wikipedian excised it, unless they didn't read past the first couple of paragraphs.

So I restored it.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 01:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction with other wiki article

There is an error in reporting in either this or the James Barker article. This article states that Hamza's sister was seven, the other claims she was five. Which is it? Shantron 00:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and the BBC and Guardian articles say she was six. Anchoress 05:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegedly

Considering that legal proceedings are not over in this case, I think that "who was gang-raped, burned and killed, by American troops." should read "who was gang-raped, burned and killed, allegedly by American troops." Isn't this normal procedure for an ongoing case?

I already made this change once, and someone changed it back without comment. If you are going to remove it again, please explain why. 24.91.126.96 23:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]