The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great Wyrley Landywood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphan describing a, completely non-notable, ward of a village. If there is anything useful, and I'm not seeing it, that could be merged into Great Wyrley KJP1 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. KJP1 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: ward with no claim to notability.PamD 23:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Geography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.