Welcome to Wikipedia, TommyTomsk! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Adakiko (talk) 10:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i enjoy being a wikipedian

TommyTomsk (talk) 10:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)TommyTomsk[reply]

I also enjoy being on wikifur, but as a non-furry person, as of today

TommyTomsk (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2025 (UTC)TommyTomsk[reply]

theyre sausages

TommyTomsk (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Subarú (brazillian football player)[reply]

The hoax material you added to your sandbox was completely inappropriate. Don't post anything of the sort on Wikipedia again.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for what i did.

It was a joke tho. TwT

TommyTomsk (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)TomTom[reply]

kill me TommyTomsk (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, i tried to make a humorous essay:/ TommyTomsk (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Roswell Invaders. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are a spy device made by the government to track you. TommyTomsk (talk) 17:27, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

No reason.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roswell Invaders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

its a disgrace TommyTomsk (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i did nothing but give a baseball team a article TommyTomsk (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You briefly had a {{help}} template here on your user talk page, which brought it to my attention. Looking at the messages posted here, you seem to be a bit out of control. I appreciate that you want to contribute to Wikipedia, but jokes, hoaxes, unsourced submissions are all things that we don't expect to see from editors who are here to help build the encyclopedia. I don't see how comparing another user to the president of FIFA is any sort of personal attack, but it's the sort of thing that can blow up if misinterpreted. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:10, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When i say someone is the Gianni Infantino of something, i mean that they are corrupt. TommyTomsk (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no one cares TommyTomsk (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend not using such language or phrases. You should be wp:here to build an encyclopedia. See also wp:Purpose. Other stuff, not related to "improving content", should generally take place on other websites.

Some controlled humor is acceptable, just not in articles, or less enforced, article talk pages. See wp:humor. There are some humorous articles tucked away - Category:Wikipedia humor Some find Wikipedia editing often unrewarding. It's dry, "just the sourced facts, ma'am". Please be careful, editors are wp:blocked for excessive jokes. If you have questions, you could ask for help here again or at the wp:teahouse. Cheers Adakiko (talk)

See wp:Userboxes for how to use, and wp:Userboxes/Interests/02#Football. Might also be interested in User:Ken Tony/UBX/Word Soccer. The userboxes I would probably use are 1-4 & 6 in this list wp:Userboxes/Sports#No Sports.

If you are interested in helping out with football articles, please check out wp:WikiProject Football? Not sure which football. A list of them: Football (disambiguation)... I suspect you are interested in [[wp::WikiProject Football|WikiProject association rules]]. Also: wp:WikiProject American football, wp:WikiProject Australian rules football, wp:WikiProject Canadian football, or maybe, wp:WikiProject National Football League? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

im interested in soccer not rugby TommyTomsk (talk) 10:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it wasnt vandalism or something, but i tried to say the truth, Sad thing a brainwashed bastard banned me from editing in my native language's wiki. TommyTomsk (talk) 14:31, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a corrupt admin, for no reason...

A tag has been placed on Elite Sports Academy Dubai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the Corruption of Wikipedia for Dummies, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Johnj1995 (talk) 14:50, 25 Also, im a corrupt admin who will delete everything, EVERYTHING! Because im fucking depressed and fell like deleting human knowledge! March 2025 (UTC)

(Redacted) what did i do TommyTomsk (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster _talk 16:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, now im going to wikifur TommyTomsk (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And its all because of a emirati sports club TommyTomsk (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TommyTomsk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i was blocked for over a literal article TommyTomsk (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)innocent[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that Wikipedia has zero tolerance for the extreme racism you exhibited. It's unlikely you'll ever be unblocked. Given the hate speech you used, you'll probably be happier on a completely different website. I strongly urge all further unblock requests to be declined out of hand. --Yamla (talk) 16:29, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not racist, i just want to be mature as possible. not racist And i dont want to be like the immature bitches that are like "hey no cuss words!1!!1!1 ahh mature!!1!1!!!1 ban ts guy!1!!1! i love corruption!!1!!1", which are like you, your parents, our universe, and websites. We shouldve not outlawed cuss words and slurs and keep them for everyone so that they could mature, the better way, Also, everyone shouldnt get banned over "extreme racism", instead its their opinons, not yours. as we can do whatever we want, such as using wikipedia as a racism app, for wrongdoings and not for vandalism Promise ill do useful contributions, queen yamla III of being immature

--TommyTomsk (talk), 25 March 2025 TommyTomsk (talk)guy

you should love racism, not hate racism TommyTomsk (talk) 19:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and i did nothing TommyTomsk (talk) 19:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TommyTomsk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benin Second divison, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TommyTomsk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Askam United, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TommyTomsk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roswell Invaders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Benin Second divison, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:23, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TommyTomsk. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Askam United".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:30, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]