This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
April 2023 Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Music of Australia. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.19.124.151. Binksternet (talk) 02:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] May 2023 Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, You're the Voice, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] July 2023 Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at On the Run (Paul McCartney). Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. See Countries of the United Kingdom. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 19:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. October 2023 Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Brit Awards 1990, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. A type of cabinet (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply] December 2023 Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by YTV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Got the Feelin'. Binksternet (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to This Morning (TV programme), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.19.40.217 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I thought was only trying to make a good contribution to editing on Wikipedia, however it's clear to me that I have caused some disrpution to editing and I take full responsibility for what I've done and for that I would like to apologise. From now on I promise I will make better contributions to Wikipedia and will use talk pages going forward to avoid edit warring and disruption and I also promise that this kind of behaviour will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.19.40.217 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I thought was only trying to make a good contribution to editing on Wikipedia, however it's now clear to me that I have caused some disrpution to editing by removing some references when I shouldn't have. I take full responsibility for what I've done and realised I should've constructed edits clearly with other editors and used talk pages to avoid being blocked and for that I would like to apologise. From now on I promise I will make better contributions to Wikipedia and will use talk pages to discuss editing and making changes on a page and going forward to avoid edit warring and disruption and to construct better with other editors and I also promise that this kind of behaviour will not happen again.

Decline reason:

This is essentially the same unblock request you made previously, which was declined. Please don't waste our time like this. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not trying to waste anyone's time, I did the right thing by explaining what I did was wrong, I took responsibility for my own actions and that this kind of behaviour would not happen again, so my question is are you saying that I haven't got the right to appeal? and if not then what do I have to do to convince you that I can be unblocked 82.19.40.217 (talk) 17:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peter O'Brien (actor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barbara Taylor Bradford, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Feeglgeef (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, I think You'll find there was the link to that reliable source on the page says She died following a short illness. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 12:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I was looking through it and could not find it. You are right! I've rollback to your version. Thanks, and Sorry! Feeglgeef (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 82.19.40.217, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Sandcat555 (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NXcrypto. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jason Connery have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nxcrypto Message 16:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Trey Farley, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 14:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on your talk page asking you Not, to delete the Trey Farley page, He is a well known TV Presenter, best known for presenting Live & Kicking, so I am against the page deletion. 82.19.40.217 (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 17:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There was an WP:AFD discussion on it, which explicitly concluded with a consensus that the article was not properly sourced for the purposes of earning him a standalone biographical article, and thus he should be redirected to the show. So if you think you can do better than the original article, by citing proper WP:GNG-worthy sourcing to properly demonstrate his notability, then you're perfectly free to try writing a draft new version at Draft:Trey Farley — but you are not free to arbitrarily overrule an AFD consensus by just restoring the old article as it was. Bearcat (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And just for the record, when it comes to establishing that a person is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, reliable sourcing does not mean IMDb or his "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of companies he's directly affiliated with (like production companies whose film or television projects he appeared in, or his management agent) — it means analytical content about his career in third party sources like newspapers, magazines or books. Bearcat (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Onorem. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Onorem (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shine a Little Love. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. You appear to be on an anti-US crusade. Desist. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shine a Little Love. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The lead to Shine a Little Love was established. You were entitled to amend it, but that edit had been challenged. Per WP:BRD, if you think the lead should not mention the US release, start a discussion on the talk page. Dorsetonian (talk)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on BBC Radio. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Antony Green, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Wiiformii (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Go Jetters, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning. Seasider53 (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.19.40.217 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I take responsibility for my own wrong doing, there's no excuse for it, I should've used the talk page to sort out what should be on a Wikipedia page rather than edit warring. I only just want to make good contributions to Wikipedia, that's why I put the British-born on famous people who were born in the UK because their nationality is not really australian or any other country. However my reverted edits suggested otherwise and I now accept that and want to find a way forward. I do regret getting myself blocked from editing and for that I do apologise and I promise that if I was to get unblocked then I can assure you that this kind of behaviour won't happen again. I just want to make good contributions, that's all.82.19.40.217 (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

These are essentially the same promises made in the last set of unblock requests, and you resumed the disruptive behavior after those blocks expired. I think you need to wait this one and reflect on how your conduct will be different next year. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.