1891 Spanish general election
1 February 1891 (Congress)
15 February 1891 (Senate) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 446 seats in the Congress of Deputies and 180 (of 360) seats in the Senate 224 seats needed for a majority in the Congress of Deputies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered | 4,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A general election was held in Spain on Sunday, 1 February (for the Congress of Deputies) and on Sunday, 15 February 1891 (for the Senate), to elect the members of the 5th Cortes under the Spanish Constitution of 1876, during the Restoration period. All 442 seats in the Congress of Deputies—plus four special districts—were up for election, as well as 180 of 360 seats in the Senate. Following a 1890 reform of the electoral law that saw a change from the previous censitary suffrage to a universal manhood suffrage, the electorate was extended to about 27.3% of the country's population.[1]
Since the Pact of El Pardo, an informal system known as turno or turnismo was operated by the monarchy and the country's two main parties—the Conservatives and the Liberals—to determine in advance the outcome of elections by means of electoral fraud, often achieved through the territorial clientelistic networks of local bosses (the caciques), ensuring that both parties would have rotating periods in power. As a result, elections were often neither truly free nor fair, though they could be more competitive in the country's urban centres where caciquism was weaker.
The election saw a large parliamentary majority for the Conservative Party after Antonio Cánovas del Castillo's return to power in July 1890, following the end of the Liberal "turn" of government between 1885 and 1890.
Background
Following the Bourbon Restoration in 1874, the Spanish Constitution of 1876 enshrined Spain as a semi-constitutional monarchy, awarding the monarch—under the royal prerogative—the right of legislative initiative together with the bicameral Cortes; the capacity to veto laws passed by the legislative body; the power to appoint government members (including the prime minister); the ability to grant or deny parliamentary dissolution, the adjournment of legislative sessions and the signature of royal decrees; as well as the title of commander-in-chief of the armed forces.[2][3] The monarch would play a key role in the turno system by appointing and dismissing governments, which would then organize elections to provide themselves with a parliamentary majority. This informal system allowed the two major "dynastic" political parties at the time, the Conservatives and the Liberals—characterized as oligarchic, elite parties with loose structures dominated by internal factions, each led by powerful individuals—to alternate in power by means of electoral fraud (pucherazo). This was achieved by assigning candidates to districts before the elections were held (encasillado), then arrange their victory through the links between the Ministry of Governance and the territorial clientelistic networks of provincial governors and local bosses (the caciques), excluding minor parties from the power sharing.[4][5]
The 1885–1890 Liberal government of Práxedes Mateo Sagasta (later to be known as the "Long Government" or "Long Parliament", in reference to it being the only one during the Restoration period to last its full five year-term)[6] had seen the introduction of many liberalizing reforms: the 1886 abolition of patronage removed the last vestiges of slavery in Cuba; the 1887 Associations Law allowed the establishment of trade unions such as the General Union of Workers (UGT), as well as the celebration of associative congresses and meetings; the 1888 Jury Law favoured freedom of press by ending prior censorship and taking the jurisdiction over crimes such as slander and defamation away from the military; and the 1889 Civil Code which, coupled with the Administrative Procedure Law and the 1888 Administrative Litigation Law (also dubbed in Spanish as Ley Santamaría de Paredes), codified and structured the existing civil and administrative laws.[7][8][9] Finally, the approval of a new electoral law in 1890 reinstated universal manhood suffrage in Spain, definitely repealing censitary suffrage for all forthcoming elections and extending the political franchise from about 5% of the population to nearly 25%.[1] Other changes included a simplification of the electoral process as well as the removal of the system allowing deputies to be elected through cumulative voting.[10][11]
Sagasta was dismissed by Queen Regent Maria Christina—nearly at the end of his five year-mandate—in the context of the "hunch crisis" (Spanish: crisis de la corazonada), referred to as such based on a comment from General Arsenio Martínez Campos claiming to have the "hunch" that the Liberals' days in power were numbered, amid rumours of the opposition threatening to unveil a scandal that could hurt Sagasta's reputation or that of his family.[12] Under the provisions of the Pact of El Pardo, this paved the way for the next "turn" of government under the Conservatives of Antonio Cánovas del Castillo, who assumed office in July 1890 and started preparations for the general election that was to provide the new government with a parliamentary majority.
Overview
Under the 1876 Constitution, the Spanish Cortes were envisaged as "co-legislative bodies", based on a nearly perfect bicameral system.[13] Both the Congress of Deputies and the Senate had legislative, control and budgetary functions, sharing equal powers except for laws on contributions or public credit, the first reading of which corresponded to Congress, and impeachment processes against government ministers, in which each chamber had separate powers of indictment (Congress) and trial (Senate).[14][15]
Electoral system
Voting for the Congress of Deputies was on the basis of universal manhood suffrage (introduced by the new electoral law of 1890), which comprised all national males over 25 years of age, having at least a two-year residency in a municipality and in full enjoyment of their civil rights.[16][17][18][19] In Cuba and Puerto Rico, voting was on the basis of censitary suffrage, comprising males of age fulfilling one of the following criteria:[20][21][22]
- Being taxpayers with a minimum quota of Pts 125 per territorial contribution (paid at least one year in advance) or per industrial or trade subsidy (paid at least two years in advance);
- Having a particular position (full academics in the royal academies; members of ecclesiastical councils, including parish priests; active public employees with a yearly salary of at least Pts 2,000; unemployed and retired public employees; general officers of the Army and Navy exempt from service, and retired military and naval chiefs and officers; reporters, chamber secretaries and court clerks of higher courts; and certified teachers);
- Painters and sculptors awarded in national or international exhibitions;
- Those meeting the two-year residency requirement, provided that an educational or professional capacity could be proven.
Additionally, voters were required to not being sentenced—by a final court ruling—to perpetual disqualification from political rights or public offices, to afflictive penalties not legally rehabilitated at least two years in advance, nor to other criminal penalties that remained unserved at the time of the election; neither being legally incapacitated, bankrupt, insolvent, debtors of public funds (including their substitutes or jointly liable parties), nor homeless.[16][20]
The Congress of Deputies was entitled to one seat per each 50,000 inhabitants. 107 members were elected in 31 multi-member constituencies using a partial block voting system: in constituencies electing eight seats or more, electors could vote for no more than three candidates less than the number of seats to be allocated; in those with more than four seats and up to eight, for no more than two less; and in those with more than one seat and up to four, for no more than one less. The remaining 335 seats were elected in single-member districts using plurality voting and distributed among the provinces of Spain and the Spanish West Indies in proportion to their populations.[23][24][25][26] The 1890 electoral reform abolished cumulative voting elections but introduced special districts: literary universities, economic societies of Friends of the Country and officially organized chambers of commerce, industry and agriculture were entitled to one seat per each 5,000 registered voters that they comprised, which resulted in four additional special districts.[27]
As a result of the aforementioned allocation, each Congress multi-member constituency was entitled the following seats:[22][24][28]
| Seats | Constituencies |
|---|---|
| 8 | Madrid |
| 6 | Havana(–2) |
| 5 | Barcelona, Palma |
| 4 | Santa Clara(–1), Seville |
| 3 | Alicante, Almería, Badajoz, Burgos, Cádiz, Cartagena, Córdoba, Granada, Jaén, Jerez de la Frontera, La Coruña, Lugo, Málaga, Matanzas, Murcia, Oviedo, Pamplona, Pinar del Río, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santander, Santiago de Cuba(–1), Tarragona, Valencia, Valladolid, Zaragoza |
Voting for the elective part of the Senate was on the basis of censitary suffrage, which comprised archbishops and bishops (in the ecclesiastical councils); full academics (in the royal academies); rectors, full professors, enrolled doctors, directors of secondary education institutes and heads of special schools in their respective territories (in the universities); members with at least a three-year-old membership (in the economic societies); major taxpayers and Spanish citizens of age, being householders residing in Spain and in full enjoyment of their political and civil rights (for delegates in the local councils); and provincial deputies.[29]
180 seats in the Senate were elected using an indirect, write-in, two-round majority voting system. Voters in the economic societies, the local councils and major taxpayers elected delegates—equivalent in number to one per each 50 members (in each economic society) or to one-sixth of the councillors (in each local council), with an initial minimum of one—who, together with other voting-able electors, would in turn vote for senators. The provinces of Álava, Albacete, Ávila, Biscay, Cuenca, Guadalajara, Guipúzcoa, Huelva, Logroño, Matanzas, Palencia, Pinar del Río, Puerto Príncipe, Santa Clara, Santander, Santiago de Cuba, Segovia, Soria, Teruel, Valladolid and Zamora were allocated two seats each, whereas each of the remaining provinces was allocated three seats, for a total of 147.[30] The remaining 33 were allocated to special districts comprising a number of institutions, electing one seat each: the archdioceses of Burgos, Granada, Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Cuba, Seville, Tarragona, Toledo, Valencia, Valladolid and Zaragoza; the six oldest royal academies (the Royal Spanish; History; Fine Arts of San Fernando; Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences; Moral and Political Sciences and Medicine); the universities of Madrid, Barcelona, Granada, Havana, Oviedo, Salamanca, Santiago, Seville, Valencia, Valladolid and Zaragoza; and the economic societies of Madrid, Barcelona, Havana–Puerto Rico, León, Seville and Valencia.[31][32][33][34]
An additional 180 seats comprised senators in their own right—the monarch's offspring and the heir apparent once coming of age; grandees of Spain with an annual income of at least Pts 60,000 (from their own real estate or from rights that enjoy the same legal consideration); captain generals of the Army and admirals of the Navy; the Patriarch of the Indies and archbishops; and the presidents of the Council of State, the Supreme Court, the Court of Auditors and the Supreme Council of War and Navy, after two years of service—as well as senators for life appointed directly by the monarch.[31]
The law provided for by-elections to fill seats vacated in both the Congress and Senate throughout the legislative term.[35][36]
Eligibility
For the Congress, Spanish citizens of age, of secular status, in full enjoyment of their civil rights and with the legal capacity to vote could run for election, provided that they were not contractors of public works or services, within the territorial scope of their contracts; nor holders of government-appointed offices and presidents or members of provincial deputations—during their tenure of office and up to one year after their dismissal—in constituencies within the whole or part of their respective area of jurisdiction, except for government ministers and civil servants in the Central Administration.[37][38] A number of other positions were exempt from ineligibility, provided that no more than 40 deputies benefitted from these:[39][40]
- Civil, military and judicial positions with a permanent residence in Madrid and a yearly public salary of at least Pts 12,500;
- The holders of a number of positions: the president, prosecutors and chamber presidents of the territorial court of Madrid; the rector and full professors of the Central University of Madrid; inspectors of engineers; and general officers of the Army and Navy based in Madrid.
For the Senate, eligibility was limited to Spanish citizens over 35 years of age and not subject to criminal prosecution, disfranchisement nor asset seizure, provided that they were entitled to be appointed as senators in their own right or belonged or had belonged to one of the following categories:[41][42]
- Those who had ever served as senators before the promulgation of the 1876 Constitution; and deputies having served in at least three different congresses or eight terms;
- The holders of a number of positions: presidents of the Senate and the Congress; government ministers; bishops; grandees of Spain not eligible as senators in their own right; and presidents and directors of the royal academies;
- Provided an annual income of at least Pts 7,500 from either their own property, salaries from jobs that cannot be lost except for legally proven cause, or from retirement, withdrawal or termination: full academics of the aforementioned corporations on the first half of the seniority scale in their corps; first-class inspectors-general of the corps of civil, mining and forest engineers; and full professors with at least four years of seniority in their category and practice;
- Provided two prior years of service: Army's lieutenant generals and Navy's vice admirals; and other members and prosecutors of the Council of State, the Supreme Court, the Court of Auditors, the Supreme Council of War and Navy, and the dean of the Court of Military Orders;
- Ambassadors after two years of service and plenipotentiaries after four;
- Those with an annual income of Pts 20,000 or were taxpayers with a minimum quota of Pts 4,000 in direct contributions at least two years in advance, provided that they either belonged to the Spanish nobility, had been previously deputies, provincial deputies or mayors in provincial capitals or towns over 20,000 inhabitants.
Other causes of ineligibility for the Senate were imposed on territorial-level officers in government bodies and institutions—during their tenure of office and up to three months after their dismissal—in constituencies within the whole or part of their respective area of jurisdiction; contractors of public works or services; tax collectors and their guarantors; debtors of public funds (including their substitutes or jointly liable parties); deputies; local councillors (except those in Madrid); and provincial deputies by their respective provinces.[43]
Election date
The term of each chamber of the Cortes—the Congress and one-half of the elective part of the Senate—expired five years from the date of their previous election, unless they were dissolved earlier.[44] The previous elections were held on 4 April 1886 for the Congress and on 25 April 1886 for the Senate, which meant that the chambers' terms would have expired on 4 and 25 April 1891, respectively.
The monarch had the prerogative to dissolve both chambers at any given time—either jointly or separately—and call a snap election.[45][46] There was no constitutional requirement for concurrent elections to the Congress and the Senate, nor for the elective part of the Senate to be renewed in its entirety except in the case that a full dissolution was agreed by the monarch. Still, there was only one case of a separate election (for the Senate in 1877) and no half-Senate elections taking place under the 1876 Constitution.
The Cortes were officially dissolved on 29 December 1890, with the dissolution decree setting election day for 1 February (Congress) and 15 February 1891 (Senate) and scheduling for both chambers to reconvene on 2 March.[47]
Results
Congress of Deputies
| Parties and alliances | Popular vote | Seats | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | |||
| Liberal Conservative Party (PLC) | 284 | |||
| Liberal Party (PL) | 100 | |||
| Liberal Reformist Party (PLR) | 17 | |||
| Republican Coalition (CR) | 15 | |||
| Progressive Republican Party (PRP) | 12 | |||
| Martists (M) | 8 | |||
| Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT) | 4 | |||
| Integrist Party (PI) | 2 | |||
| Independents (INDEP) | 4 | |||
| Total | 446 | |||
| Votes cast / turnout | ||||
| Abstentions | ||||
| Registered voters | 4,800,000 | |||
| Sources[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] | ||||
Senate
| Parties and alliances | Seats | |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Conservative Party (PLC) | 114 | |
| Liberal Party (PL) | 40 | |
| Liberal Reformist Party (PLR) | 8 | |
| Republican Coalition (CR) | 1 | |
| Martists (M) | 1 | |
| Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT) | 1 | |
| Integrist Party (PI) | 1 | |
| Independents (INDEP) | 4 | |
| Archbishops (ARCH) | 10 | |
| Total elective seats | 180 | |
| Sources[61][62][63][64][65][66][67] | ||
Distribution by group
| Group | Parties and alliances | C | S | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLC | Liberal Conservative Party (PLC) | 259 | 105 | 398 | ||
| Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC) | 13 | 6 | ||||
| Unconditional Spanish Party (PIE) | 9 | 2 | ||||
| Independents (INDEP) | 2 | 0 | ||||
| Basque Dynastics (Urquijist) (DV) | 1 | 1 | ||||
| PL | Liberal Party (PL) | 86 | 32 | 140 | ||
| Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC) | 10 | 7 | ||||
| Unconditional Spanish Party (PIE) | 4 | 1 | ||||
| PLR | Liberal Reformist Party (PLR) | 14 | 8 | 25 | ||
| Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC) | 3 | 0 | ||||
| CR | Possibilist Democratic Party (PDP) | 6 | 1 | 16 | ||
| Federal Republican Party (PRF) | 5 | 0 | ||||
| Centralist Republican Party (PRC) | 2 | 0 | ||||
| Puerto Rican Autonomist Party (PAP) | 2 | 0 | ||||
| PRP | Progressive Republican Party (PRP) | 12 | 0 | 12 | ||
| M | Martists (M) | 8 | 1 | 9 | ||
| CT | Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT) | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||
| PI | Integrist Party (PI) | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| INDEP | Independents (INDEP) | 4 | 3 | 8 | ||
| Basque Dynastics (Urquijist) (DV) | 0 | 1 | ||||
| ARCH | Archbishops (ARCH) | 0 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Total | 446 | 180 | 626 | |||
Notes
References
- ^ a b Caballero Domínguez 1999, p. 50.
- ^ Calero 1987, p. 275.
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 18, 22, 32, 41, 44 & 51–54.
- ^ Martorell Linares 1997, pp. 139–143.
- ^ Martínez Relanzón 2017, pp. 147–148.
- ^ Martínez Ruiz, Maqueda Abreu & De Diego 1999, p. 111.
- ^ Martínez Relanzón 2017, p. 146.
- ^ Montagut, Eduardo (24 November 2016). "El Gobierno de Sagasta (1885-1890)". Nueva Tribuna (in Spanish). Retrieved 21 August 2022.
- ^ De la Santa Cinta, Joaquín (16 August 2017). "Presidentes del Consejo de Ministros durante la Regencia de María Cristina de Habsburgo-Lorena: Práxedes Mateo Sagasta". El Correo de Pozuelo (in Spanish). Retrieved 4 May 2023.
- ^ Fernández Almagro 1943, pp. 412–413.
- ^ Law of 26 June (1890)
- ^ Sampedro Escolar 2013, p. 152.
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 18–19 & 41.
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 38, 42 & 45.
- ^ "Conocer el Senado. Temas clave. El Senado en la historia constitucional española" (in Spanish). Senate of Spain. Retrieved 11 October 2025.
- ^ a b Law of 26 June (1890), arts. 1–2.
- ^ Ortega Álvarez & Santaolaya Machetti 1996, p. 88.
- ^ García Muñoz 2002, pp. 106–107.
- ^ Carreras de Odriozola & Tafunell Sambola 2005, p. 1077.
- ^ a b Law of 28 December (1878), arts. 142–143.
- ^ García Muñoz 2002, p. 107.
- ^ a b Roldán de Montaud 1999, pp. 269–270.
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 27–28.
- ^ a b Law of 26 June (1890), art. 22 & trans. prov. 1, applying Law of 28 December (1878), art. 2, applying Law of 1 January (1871), art. 1. District boundaries were further modified by the Law of 21 March (1883), the Law of 23 June (1885), the Law of 18 January (1887), and the Law of 10 July (1888).
- ^ Decree of 1 April (1871), arts. 2–3.
- ^ Ortega Álvarez & Santaolaya Machetti 1996, p. 89.
- ^ Law of 26 June (1890), art. 24.
- ^ Royal Decree of 18 December (1890), art. 1.
- ^ Law of 8 February (1877), arts. 1–3, 12–13 & 25.
- ^ Real decreto determinando el número de Senadores que habrán de elegirse en cada una de las provincias con motivo de las próximas elecciones (PDF) (Royal Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 30 June 1881. Retrieved 11 October 2025.
- ^ a b Constitution (1876), arts. 20–21.
- ^ Law of 8 February (1877), arts. 1–2, 21–22, 30–31 & 53.
- ^ Law of 9 January (1879), arts. 1–3.
- ^ Carreras de Odriozola & Tafunell Sambola 2005, p. 1083.
- ^ Law of 8 February (1877), arts. 56–59.
- ^ Law of 26 June (1890), arts. 73–76.
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 29 & 31.
- ^ Law of 26 June (1890), arts. 3–5.
- ^ Law of 7 March (1880), arts. 1–4.
- ^ Law of 31 July (1887).
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 22 & 26.
- ^ Law of 8 February (1877), art. 4.
- ^ Law of 8 February (1877), arts. 5–9.
- ^ Constitution (1876), arts. 24 & 30.
- ^ Constitution (1876), art. 32.
- ^ Law of 8 February (1877), art. 11.
- ^ Real decreto declarando disuelto el Consejo de los Diputados y la parte electiva del Senado, mandando reunir las Cortes el día 2 de Marzo próximo, y señalando los días en que habrán de verificarse las elecciones de Diputados y Senadores (PDF) (Royal Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 29 December 1890. Retrieved 18 August 2025.
- ^ López Domínguez 1976, pp. 434–471.
- ^ Armengol i Segú & Varela Ortega 2001, pp. 655–776.
- ^ "Elecciones generales. Candidatos a diputados a Cortes por todos los distritos de la Península (1)". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Siglo Futuro. 30 January 1891. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ "Elecciones generales. Candidatos a diputados a Cortes por todos los distritos de la Península (2)". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Siglo Futuro. 31 January 1891. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 31 January 1891. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 2 February 1891. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones en provincias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Heraldo de Madrid. 2 February 1891. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
- ^ "Congreso de los Diputados". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El País. 2 February 1891. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
- ^ "Datos oficiales". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 3 February 1891. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
- ^ "Los nuevos diputados". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 3 February 1891. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones de diputados". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 4 February 1891. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La República. 4 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Resumen general de las elecciones de diputados a Cortes". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 23 February 1891. Retrieved 16 September 2022.
- ^ "Provincias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Correspondencia de España. 16 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Elección de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 16 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Elecciones de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Justicia. 16 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Elecciones de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Liberal. 16 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 16 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Senadores por Cuba". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Heraldo de Madrid. 16 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
- ^ "Las elecciones de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La República. 17 February 1891. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
Bibliography
- Ley mandando que los distritos para las elecciones de Diputados a Cortes sean los que se expresan en la división adjunta (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 1 January 1871. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
- Decreto mandando se verifiquen en Puerto Rico las elecciones ordinarias de Senadores y Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 1 April 1871. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Constitución de la Monarquía Española (PDF) (Constitution). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 30 June 1876. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Ley electoral de Senadores (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 8 February 1877. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Ley electoral de los Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 28 December 1878. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Ley dictando reglas para la elección de Senadores en las islas de Cuba y Puerto Rico (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 9 January 1879. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Ley enumerando los empleos con los cuales es compatible el cargo de Diputado a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 7 March 1880. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
- Ley fijando la división de la provincia de Vizcaya en distritos para la elección de Diputados a Cortes y la de aquellos en secciones (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 21 March 1883. Retrieved 3 August 2025.
- Ley dividiendo la provincia de Guipúzcoa en distritos para la elección de Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 23 June 1885. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
- Ley dividiendo el distrito electoral de Tarrasa en dos, que se denominarán de Tarrasa y de Sabadell (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 18 January 1887. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
- Ley reformando el art. 4º. de la ley de Incompatibilidades (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 31 July 1887. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
- Ley fijando la división de la provincia de Álava en distritos electorales para Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 10 July 1888. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
- Ley electoral para Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 26 June 1890. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Real decreto disponiendo que mientras no se publique nueva ley Electoral rija en la isla de Cuba la división en circunscripciones y distritos para la elección de Diputados a Cortes aprobada en el Congreso en la forma que se expresa (PDF) (Royal Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 18 December 1890. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
- Fernández Almagro, Melchor (1943). "Las Cortes del siglo XIX y la práctica electoral" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (9–10). Madrid: Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies: 383–419. ISSN 0048-7694. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
- López Domínguez, José María (1976). Elecciones y partidos políticos de Puerto Rico: 1809-1898 (PDF) (Thesis) (in Spanish). Vol. 1. Puerto Rico: Complutense University of Madrid. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
- Calero, Antonio María (1987). "La prerrogativa regia en la Restauración: teoría y práctica (1875-1902)" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (55). Madrid: Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies: 273–315. ISSN 0048-7694.
- Ortega Álvarez, Luis; Santaolaya Machetti, Pablo (1996). "Evolución histórica del sistema electoral español". Revista de las Cortes Generales (in Spanish). 37. Cortes Generales: 65–107. doi:10.33426/rcg/1996/37/784. ISSN 0213-0130.
- Martorell Linares, Miguel Ángel (1997). "La crisis parlamentaria de 1913-1917. La quiebra del sistema de relaciones parlamentarias de la Restauración" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (96). Madrid: Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies: 137–161. ISSN 0048-7694.
- Martínez Ruiz, Enrique; Maqueda Abreu, Consuelo; De Diego, Emilio (1999). Atlas histórico de España. La Regencia de María Cristina (1885-1902) (in Spanish). Vol. 2. Bilbao: Ediciones KAL. pp. 109–120. ISBN 9788470903502.
- Roldán de Montaud, Inés (1999). "Política y elecciones en Cuba durante la restauración" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (104): 245–287. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
- Caballero Domínguez, Margarita (1999). "El derecho de representación: sufragio y leyes electorales" (PDF). Ayer (in Spanish) (34): 41–63. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
- Armengol i Segú, Josep; Varela Ortega, José (2001). El poder de la influencia: geografía del caciquismo en España (1875-1923) (in Spanish). Madrid: Marcial Pons. pp. 655–776. ISBN 9788425911521.
- García Muñoz, Montserrat (2002). "La documentación electoral y el fichero histórico de diputados". Revista General de Información y Documentación (in Spanish). 12 (1): 93–137. ISSN 1132-1873. Retrieved 13 September 2020.
- Carreras de Odriozola, Albert; Tafunell Sambola, Xavier (2005) [1989]. Estadísticas históricas de España, siglos XIX-XX (PDF) (in Spanish). Vol. 1 (II ed.). Bilbao: Fundación BBVA. pp. 1072–1097. ISBN 84-96515-00-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015.
- Sampedro Escolar, José Luis (2013). "Sagasta: Nobleza y liberalismo". Berceo. Revista Riojana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (in Spanish) (164). Logroño: 131–177. ISSN 0210-8550. Retrieved 3 May 2023.
- Martínez Relanzón, Alejandro (2017). "Political Modernization in Spain Between 1876 and 1923". Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio K. 24 (1). Madrid: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University: 145–154. doi:10.17951/k.2017.24.1.145. S2CID 159328027.

