Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Below are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 16:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 16:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sawyer. :) ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 16:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Not-deer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Artemisia did there use to be an article about horror icons? DervilaMoneri (talk) 14:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I remember there was once whatever happened to it? DervilaMoneri (talk) 14:18, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time so I really don't know I was wondering if you might help in recreating an old article DervilaMoneri (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this was User:Jinnifer evading their block. MrOllie (talk) 14:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Betsy Arakawa 1980s.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Khiikiat (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		You have made a great start! Bearian (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 11:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. Thank you for your work on Stabilimento Artistico Bertoni. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: I have added it. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sport in the Principality of Sealand, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Since you ignored the edit summaries and the talk page discussion, it seems a formal warning is in order. DrKay (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DrKay: As I have already stated, the issues were previously addressed. Your claim that the sources do not support the claim is blatantly incorrect. The sources explicitly make mention of an event occurring yearly. You continuing to add the tags in spite of that is disruptive. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Read the tags. You have not addressed the concerns written clearly in the 'reason' parameter. DrKay (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gene Hackman and Betsy Arakawa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 02:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gene Hackman and Betsy Arakawa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 03:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gene Hackman and Betsy Arakawa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. RoySmith (talk) 13:02, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gene Hackman and Betsy Arakawa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Olympic sportspeople convicted of crimes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adam Black. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mata Hari without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 21:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Black: My edit summary did explain why the content was removed. My edit summary linked to MOS:POPCULT, which states that trivia sections should be avoided. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 22:18, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to a long, 9.6 kB policy page with multiple sections does not adequately explain why you removed a large chunk of content. Also, I wouldn't call a list of films, stage musicals and songs based on Hari mere "trivia". Some individual content in that section may warrant removal, but much of it is relevant to the article. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 07:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you don't consider the policy page I linked to be a good enough explanation doesn't mean that I did not leave an edit summary or that I did not explain my edit. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 10:22, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you recently removed content from Mata Hari without adequately explaining why. (emphasis added) - my issue was that the explanation was not adequate. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 18:36, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Black This is shaping up to be a run of the mill content dispute; please don't use anti-vandalism tools or warnings for those. It can come off as patronizing or insulting (If this was a mistake....If you would like to experiment) and, as you can see here, rarely leads to productive conversations. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 18:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was flagged as likely vandalism in my recent edits feed which is the only reason I reviewed it. It appeared to me to be vandalism and so I reverted and used ultraviolet to leave a warning. If the uw templates are patronising and insulting, perhaps we shouldn't use them at all? I happen to think they are helpful. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 18:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Black.... okay, that's what I was worried about. An experienced editor removing a large amount of unsourced and dubiously sourced content, with an explanation in the edit summary, isn't vandalism. You might disagree with the change, that's fair, but it's not, by any stretch of the imagination, anything resembling a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia.(WP:VANDALISM). Please review WP:VANDNOT at your earliest convenience, thank you so much. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 19:08, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And you were worried that my warning may come off as patronizing and insulting? I will admit I do not always get it right when I am reviewing potential vandalism but I do not need a patronising lecture from you to improve. Please review WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 20:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Black You don't always have to get it right, but, well, you added about 10k bytes of mostly unsourced content to an article. That's not okay, but digging in and insisting that it was vandalism is worse. I originally thought you might have just been going a bit too quickly and used the anti-vandalism tools in a content dispute because you found it more convenient than a manual revert, hence my original comment, but I was worried that you did see the edit as vandalism - but in case you did, I was trying to give you an opportunity to save face and pivot the conversation back to the actual content dispute. I haven't accused you of acting in bad faith, and I don't think in are, and I'm sorry that you find my telling you that you falsely accused somebody of vandalism is uncivil. How would you like to be told that in future? GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 20:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You've succeeded in discouraging an experienced editor from contributing to Wikipedia. I have always aimed to help make this project better. You've made me feel like I'm incapable of making a valuable contribution. I'm sure I'll be back eventually when I've forgotten this horrid interaction but for now I have lost all interest. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 00:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your juxtaposition on "killed two men and loved mangos" is pure comedy gold and I wanted to recognize you for that. Panini! • 🥪 22:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should you really be closing a discussion in which you were one of the main participants? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: I wasn't aware that was discouraged, I was under the impression that it could be done. If I was mistaken, I apologize. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 12:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant shortcut is Wikipedia:NACINV. I hope you'll revert your close and let someone uninvolved weigh in. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for letting me know. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the Gabriel Rucker article! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I think I'm going to try to expand it some more to get it to the 5x expansion threshold for DYK. Feel free to add anything you can find! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fantasy Island (UK amusement park), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantasy Island (UK amusement park) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Markass Brownie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 29 § Markass Brownie until a consensus is reached. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Gabriel Rucker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So many of your articles are delightful reads. An extinct breed of tiny dogs, a mango-loving killer bull, a flute player turned fly-fisher turned bird thief, Unknown French boy. How fun to click through your creations. Thanks Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 23:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 23:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Olympics Barnstar
	Here's a token of appreciation from me! Thanks for making Unknown French boy into an article, it really is a good read and a good article. Thank you also by making the articles of the Olympians that I've featured in DYK. :) Arconning (talk) 17:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Thanks for your good work on the Olympics too! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SL93 (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 11,147 views (928.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 21:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SL93 (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Chelsea Wolfe (BMX) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 04:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,886 views (907.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 21:24, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArtemisiaGentileschiFan, for the second running of the Developing Countries WikiContest, it is now open for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at your submissions page to earn points. The coordinators have addressed some of the queries at the last contest and we are hopeful that it'll turn out great for you—yes, you! If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page.
• Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews. Remember, reviews now award 10 points!
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules for more information or contact a coordinator.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:52, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,185 views (4,338.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Casa dei Pesci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at List of individual cetaceans, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you want to change the scope of the list, you need to discuss it on the talk page first. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. — W.andrea (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the scope is given in the lead: This list includes individuals from real life or fiction — W.andrea (talk) 00:21, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made a WP:BOLD edit to improve the content of the page based on the precedent established by other pages (IE List of individual dogs, etc). I don't think it's necessary to tag me with a vandalism template. I absolutely did give a proper edit summary. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 00:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely did give a proper edit summary.

What you said was removed fictional characters. You didn't say why. Don't get me wrong, what you wrote is better than nothing, but the point of an edit summary is to explain an edit to other editors, and the 'why' is just as important as the 'what'.

I don't think it's necessary to tag me with a vandalism template.

You removed a large chunk of content from a page without adequate explanation, which is absolutely akin to vandalism. I'm assuming good faith of course, but I wanted to get across the severity.

precedent established by other pages

Sure, and we could consider adopting the same precedent on this page, but that needs to be discussed first. Like I said, the scope is clearly defined in the lead. Did you not see it or what? By the way, at least one other person has tried removing trivial entries, and I'm on the fence myself about some of them.

— W.andrea (talk) 01:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC) edited 01:12[reply]

The article Video games in North Korea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Video games in North Korea for comments about the article, and Talk:Video games in North Korea/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sophisticatedevening -- Sophisticatedevening (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

—Ganesha811 (talk) 01:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bicep flex, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gold, silver, and bronze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that you have removed the copyright violation of her profile picture, but the photo has similar issues, mainly with issues of license verification (namely, the author of the photo may not have released the image under the appropriate license). See WP:Biographies_of_living_persons#Images for more information. Both images should be removed until this issue is resolved. Thanks — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 03:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of things on Commons, just realized myself that the video was released under an appropriate license. Will restore the image (if it hasn't been already) — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 04:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@VolatileAnomaly: The YouTube video that the screenshot originates from is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which is visible in the video description. This license is allowed on Commons. The file is not incorrectly licensed in any way that I can see. I don't really see any justification for removing the photograph. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArtemisiaGentileschiFan, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Jeong Haneul is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AdobongPogi -- AdobongPogi (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArtemisiaGentileschiFan,

I undid your addition of WikiProject Law Enforcement to the talk page of the Arrest of Rodrigo Duterte. If you read that WikiProject's Scope section you will see that articles about crime and criminals are outside scope of WikiProject Law Enforcement. If you had scanned the previous edits to the article's tak pahe you might have also noticed that the same wikiproject had been removed previously with an edit summary that explained the article was out of scope. While executing an arrest warrant is something that police may undertake as part of their day to day workload, a particular arrest is not directly Law Enforcement related because it involves the Police acting on an arrest warrant that has been issued by a judicial authority in response to a criminal charge or allegation. Since the article is already in the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, there is no point in it also being in the scope of WikiProject Law Enforcement]], as the two WikiProjects are complementary and don't cover the same ground. Also please see the guidelines WP:PROJSCOPE and WP:OVERBANNER for the broader policy about adding WikiProject banners of low importance. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Talk:Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Because your edit summary did not provide an explanation for why you added the WikiProject Crime banner to the Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol article, I have removed the banner. Also the article mentions that "the impeachment trial is not a criminal proceeding" so the article would appear to be out of scope of that WikiProject, too. If you had provided an edit summary, I might have better understood your reasons for adding the banner. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 animal births indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charlie (goat), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thx for writing Yu Zidi! What a crazy fourth place finish in the 200 IM! I hope she medals in one of her better events at this Worlds. IAWW (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan,

Please review Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Before nomination and follow the guidelines advised including leaving an informative edit summary and posting a notification on the User talk page of the article creator. It's important to follow all appropriate steps. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:59, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see from your talk page that you have received other notifications for not leaving an edit summary. Doing this is important for your fellow editors and helps explain your edits and can avoid unnecessary reverts. Please always leave an edit summary when you are working on the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:01, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 02:22, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Artemisia, thanks for taking part in the Developing Countries WikiContest! For scoring purposes, submissions need to be made under one flag. Could you pick one country you'd like to submit your GAN review of the Dai Hong Dan incident under and update your page accordingly? Let me know if you have any questions about this! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:50, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, thanks. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 16:51, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Shunsaku Tamiya at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 00:38, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Camilla Corona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're a month into the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest, with stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard already! Our current top five contestants are:

1. Spookyaki (submissions) – 256 points, mostly from a handful of GAs about women's history in Latin America as well as the 1991 Haitian coup d'état.
2. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 229 points, back with a number of articles on abortion in various African countries.
3. simongraham (submissions) – 213 points, mainly from GAs on species of jumping spiders in both Africa and Azerbaijan.
4. PizzaKing13 (submissions) – 200 points, with five GAs on articles relating to Salvadoran politics, history, and griddle cakes.
5. BeanieFan11 (submissions) – 168 points from a few GAs, a few DYKs, and a few ITNs on athletes from a variety of countries.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier!

On behalf of the coordinators, we'd like to thank all the participants for helping to combat systemic bias on Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Boughera El Ouafi is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tokeamour -- Tokeamour (talk) 04:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Boughera El Ouafi has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tokeamour -- Tokeamour (talk) 07:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't understand why people seem so quick to call out people in this particular article space. I had an issue the other day where I was accused of edit warring because, after a single revert, I responded to a request for additional sources for a certain piece of information by finding and inserting a high quality source for a piece of information. And now you've got people talking about "low-quality" edits based on a similar context - a single edit. I'm kind of scratching my head at the level of sensitivity. My suspicion is someone in the LW community is making noise about unfairness on WP on their forums. Simonm223 (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:TR1logo.png	Tomb Raider Excellence Badge – Game-Dev Star
	Your thoughtful sourcing, relentless cleanup, and refined prose have elevated the Heather Gibson (game developer) article to B-Class—like uncovering a rare artifact in the depths of a digital tomb. Thank you for channeling your inner Lara Croft and bringing clarity, depth, and polish to the page. Your work really is legendary TudorTulok (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you might have knowledge on this and the article explaining this is confusing to me. Tokeamour (talk) 19:11, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please check:United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps talk page for the DYK Nomination talking about qpq also i'm the one who did the GA review on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Boughera_El_Ouafi that you wrote, and that was one of my first GA reviews! Tokeamour (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokeamour: QPQ stands for quid pro quo. It means that when you nominate a page for DYK, you have to review someone else's nomination. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you send me a link to DYK review pledges or just DYK waiting for reviews Tokeamour (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArtemisiaGentileschiFan thanks, check message above! Tokeamour (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYKN is where the nominations are. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it sorry for the hassle ;) Tokeamour (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So when done reviewing do I let the nominator know that I did QPQ as they nominated on behalf of me. Tokeamour (talk) 22:07, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArtemisiaGentileschiFanOr do I do it before it Tokeamour (talk) 22:07, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

figured it out Tokeamour (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia: I'm not really sure why I'm getting a BLP "introduction" message now of all times since I've edited many BLP pages, gotten multiple onto DYK, and got one to GA status. I appreciate your message, I just don't really understand why I'm getting it. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 23:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bicep flex".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I wanted to let you know that I have deleted Cornhusker Clink, so you may move Draft:Cornhusker Clink at your leisure. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For making all those DYKs and editing a lot of articles that I just so happen to be watching... ;)

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the current situation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, this article could be considered controversial and should not be the subject of a proposed deletion. What do you think? Bearian (talk) 08:39, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine. I'm willing to go through the normal AFD discussion process. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 11:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. Bearian (talk) 13:17, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 14,498 views (604.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on this, by the way! I usually read main page DYKs and this one stood out to me as giving an unusually good overview of his life, so I wanted to pop in and let you know :) Rusalkii (talk) 04:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 12:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 02:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Chess at the Olympic Games at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArtemisiaGentileschiFan I have a few links for some nice pictures, below:

https://www.rosamondgiffordzoo.org/news/zoo-news/announce-illegally-created-argali-clone-finds-new-home-at-rosamond-gifford-zoo/

The Zoo website has a few nice pictures. Hope this is ok! Crystalite13 (talk) 04:10, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Crystalite13:, are these photos under a Creative Commons license? ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 04:18, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

cripes, no. that sucks Crystalite13 (talk) 04:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what do you need them for anyway? Crystalite13 (talk) 04:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Marco Polo sheep article. It would be nice to have some good-quality photos. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 04:29, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grr, there are no photos!! Crystalite13 (talk) 04:38, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1096049-Ovis-ammon-polii

@ArtemisiaGentileschiFan this inaturalist is under creative Commons license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Crystalite13 (talk) 06:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speifically, the first 2 images by Fábio Olmos Crystalite13 (talk) 06:31, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

whole gallery is full of nice photos with the licenses linked, how convient Crystalite13 (talk) 06:32, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really appreciate it! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sooooo......marco Polo barnstar? :D Crystalite13 (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the post on the reward board was for people who went to the Rosamond Gifford Zoo and took a photo. I really appreciate you finding the inaturalist images, but I can't retroactively change the challenge. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ah, I see. a shame Crystalite13 (talk) 15:14, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i misunderstood Crystalite13 (talk) 15:16, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JuniperChill (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,536 views (1,044.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AGFan! Just wanted to flag that I had to nominate for deletion on Commons the image you uploaded of Simone Leigh's Brick House sculpture as installed in Venice in 2022. There is no freedom of panorama in Italy, so we cannot host images of copyrighted art if the art is pictured in Italy.

There are, however, two images of the same sculpture installed in Switzerland, which will remain on Commons because Switzerland has sufficient freedom of panorama. The work was permanently installed outdoors in Switzerland so it's legal to make and monetize images of the work as installed there.

Thanks, hope your day's going well! 19h00s (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@19h00s: Oh hi, thanks for letting me know. My bad on that, I didn't realize Italy did not allow FoP. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Just wanted to flag so you saw there were other pics available for the article - not as close up and not installed in as significant a venue as the Biennale, but still hopefully useful :) Enjoy your weekend! 19h00s (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of emblems of sovereign states, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 1 § Brazilian Miku and Shiteyanyo until a consensus is reached. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) 23:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Spanish sportswomen has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 22:44, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond.Czarking0 (talk) 02:16, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit [1] you removed a neutrality template that was under active discussion on the talk page. It is moot now, since the issue is subject to an RfC, but please have a read of WP:MAINTENANCEDISAGREEMENT, which is linked from the template itself. Please be aware of point 3 under "when not to remove". You should not be removing templates where there is an unresolved question under active consideration, simply because you disagree. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul Charles Dozsa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There is currently a discussion about an edit you made a couple months back on whether to describe the group as predominantly transgender. You might want to participate on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zizians#Predominantly_transgender 2A00:FBC:EE1F:2437:F971:EF55:FCBE:F07F (talk) 18:13, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for chipping in. I have opened an RFC for this topic at Talk:Zizians to attempt to settle this once and for all, would appreciate your thoughts on the matter. Asamboi (talk) 06:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two weeks ago, the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard, we have our winners. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions), continuing his work on covering abortion in Africa, comes in third with 692 points. simongraham (submissions) comes in second with 763 points, largely from a slew of good articles about jumping spiders. And returning to the podium for the second year in a row, BeanieFan11 (submissions) takes the Gold Belt Buckle with a mind-boggling 946 points from his series of articles on sportpersons. Congratulations to our winners!

Amazingly, the award for the most countries covered goes to both BeanieFan11 (submissions) and simongraham (submissions), who each submitted articles under 30 flags! BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins for writing the most quality articles (16 good articles). For submitting 16 articles related to El Salvador, PizzaKing13 (submissions) wins the award for most submissions under one country. The award for most submissions related to women goes to both Spookyaki (submissions) (7 biographies about women) and vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) (21 related articles). And for the second year, simongraham (submissions) wins for the most reviews, having submitted 21!

Among the participants' contributions were 2 FAs, 5 FLs, 124 GAs, and an uncounted number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, because ya just added this tag, do you think this removes it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plurality_(identity)&curid=74162876&diff=1317745115&oldid=1317743338 Flower (she/her; User talk:IPOfAFlower) 20:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks :). ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yw :P

Only thing I'm concerned about is synth because the article itself doesn't say anything (other then recent), just the date of publishing. Flower (she/her; User talk:IPOfAFlower) 20:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's ok. Saying "as of [date of source publication]" is standard. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CHOP fits the criteria of the page, it had de-facto control over the Territory and this page includes anarchist and autonomous regions. Please reinstate CHOP to this list. JaxsonR (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it doesn't have to be declared independent to be included on this list. JaxsonR (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a state or government or country under any definition, and nobody ever claimed it was. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 22:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They proclaimed themselves as an autonomous zone, which fits the criteria. It fits the criteria. JaxsonR (talk) 22:31, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please see the source: [2] JaxsonR (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/seattle-police-investigate-shooting-inside-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone JaxsonR (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page is a list of states and dependencies. That is not the same in any way. Feel free to start a discussion on the article's talk page. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 22:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It includes autonomous zones and anarchist regions, literally read the first sentence. JaxsonR (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		A can of Moxie for you
		Howardcorn33 has given you a refreshing Moxie! Moxie is soft drink flavored with gentian root extract created around 1876 as a patent medicine called "Moxie Nerve Food." It is the origin of the word "moxie", a noun meaning energy, determination, and spunk. This is the only soda they were serving at the WikiFood store.

―Howard • 🌽³³ 01:03, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 01:05, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RachelTensions (talk) 01:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks also! :) ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 01:13, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Exit, pursued by a bear, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Didi Ekanem has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	A quetzalcoatlus for you!
	Loving your work; keep it up! This little fella appreciates it too. Staraction (talk | contribs) 22:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Emilio Palma. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. You must give an edit summary of all changes made, especially when removing so much detail. You have been told about this before. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 06:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--Launchballer 00:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,234 views (843.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on what grounds have you gone through our club wikipedia page and deleted large chunks of our clubs history? 2A02:C7C:7CD3:CB00:B563:2166:9E10:2921 (talk) 14:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the grounds that it did not have citations to reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, which is Wikipedia policy. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Launchballer 12:04, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,927 views (743.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 15:16, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of emblems of sovereign states".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:31, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cary and Michael Huang has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 2 § Cary Huang until a consensus is reached. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Paul Charles Dozsa".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

undid your edit because it seemed unconstructive to me

if you have any questions leave a message on my talk page Spritor (talk) 03:27, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on Talk:Ýdalir. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,695 views (654.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 28,511 views (1,188.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-introducing jokes into the caption. The current caption aligns with the source of the photo, and there is no compelling reason for it to state where the photo is not taken, vs where it actually is taken. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: The caption I inserted is not a joke and I don't see why you would think it is. The page is specifically about a bill that proposed to introduce hippos to the ecosystem of Louisiana, so it is entirely apt and relevant to mention that they are not endemic to Louisiana. A mention of Uganda is entirely irrelevant. The caption should be relevant to the page it's on. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 02:07, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: Frankly you should know better than to just call my edits "jokes" for no reason when they were clearly serious and done with the intent of improving the page. Honestly this feels like a failure to WP:AGF on your part. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You and I both know it was a joke featured on a popular page about funny/interesting bits in Wikipedia. The text already makes it clear that they are not endemic to Louisiana; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions, captions should be concise and informative; there's nothing in that policy about discussing what an image is not or making subtle jokes. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you that it was not a joke edit. A caption being "funny/interesting" is not the same as a joke edit. At this point you're just casting WP:ASPERSIONS. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 13:02, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for starting Draft:Pigeon feeding. If you think the draft is ready, please submit it. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:00, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just letting you know, I removed The Strange Case of Origami Yoda from the Unofficial Star Wars media navigation box as the Star Wars elements in the book series were licensed by Lucasfilm. The Editor 155 (talk) 23:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder of Theora Hix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moxie (robot), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello ArtemisiaGentileschiFan, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:22, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Thank you!!! Merry Christmas to you too! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG! shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 06:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:EDITWAR: "Avoid posting a generic warning template if you are actively involved in the edit war yourself" This is deeply unprofessional and inappropriate behavior. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you'll cope. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 06:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Locke Cole: in cases of a content disagreement, the course of action is to start a discussion and then implement the consensus. This is what I did. It is within protocol to restore the edit now that there is overwhelming consensus. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 06:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Would be awesome if you weren't also canvassing people and writing RFC's as biased as possible. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 06:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing I'm not doing either of those things. I would avoid throwing around such baseless WP:ASPERSIONS. If you really think I'm doing those things, I encourage you to take it to ANI, but I think you know you'd just catch a boomerang. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 06:24, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 crimes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —Locke Cole • t • c • b 20:32, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Maulson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tripod (alligator), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kielce Gussie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dune (cancelled film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steven & Parker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gold".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy WikiBirthday! Your account was created 23 January 2025 (UTC), so that means that as of today, your account is exactly 1 year old! dot.py 03:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I almost forgot the cake, I hope that you like ice cream cake! dot.py 03:41, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Moxie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:32, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, nice to meet you. May I know why is her picture reinstated once again? I think its better to get a better picture for her since she has already left pornography and embraced an Islamic life. JonathanHodges12 (talk) 09:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reason to remove an image of somebody that shows what they look like. Somebody adopting a religion doesn't seem like a good reason to censor photos of them. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 13:22, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well if a much more recent photo is used there is no issue then right? JonathanHodges12 (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but I don't know of any more recent photos of her that exist under a free license. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thank you for your work on the Femtanyl article! it always feels nice to have a second pair of eyes going over my edits. Happy to see the article reinstated now that there's enough good sources! Pothos144 (talk) 04:13, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well, I'm glad the article could be improved! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 04:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pigeon feeding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on Prominent individuals mentioned in the Epstein files. Bearian (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 12:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so Wiki-pilled that my first thought when I saw this news was "wait I wonder if ArtemisiaGentileschiFan knows yet" hahaha

Enjoy your weekend! 19h00s (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks haha 😁 ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2000s lost films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century lost films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of Roblox controversies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 9 § List of Roblox controversies until a consensus is reached. DAmik001 (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to 2026 Tumbler Ridge shooting. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Mikewem (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to say this but a notice was already posted. XeCyranium (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the hard work you've done for the project.

ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 02:38, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help and being way faster than I am with the creation of the Joseon Cybernation article. I don't know what would be the most appropriate thing to give, so I hope this message is enough. TansoShoshen (talk) 03:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 03:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Camilla Corona".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Casa dei Pesci".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Steven & Parker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

HurricaneZeta^C 12:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that David Woodard is in fact user on PARAKANYAA Wikipedia.

Although he has edited many articles on Wikipedia these are all articles that are of personal interest to David Woodard.

Adding things “aesthetic fascinations of Woodard” PARAKANYAA trying to make this article more like this strange gobbledygook article from the past.

David Woodard should want a good accurate article. David Woodard and he has a website that he started in 1989, which had a biography that was fake saying he was born in 1969 instead of 1964.

PARAKANYAA claims to be a Woodard expert but clearly if so would know about the truth about the Website as it is cited in the SF Gate Article. PARAKANYAA is claiming that the website davidwoodard.com has been private and blank since 1989 because he is trying to make Wikipedia look foolish again.  Archive Today has saves of the website you can check them for the dates. He thinks he can control the David Woodard Article, and he has many sock puppets and multiple accounts.

Everything that he posts about on his talk page that he's very proud of editing appears to be things about terrorism and other unpleasant subjects. Please be very careful what you say to him and and don't get steered into falling for his confidence tricks.

Girlfriend727 (talk) 23:00, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I know Para well. She is not David Woodard and she does not use sockpuppet accounts to my knowledge. She's a good editor that makes good articles. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Girlfriend727 I am not Woodard. Obviously. In fact, for some time, I thought YOU were Woodard, though I have since found evidence that this is not the case. I have freaky interests, a fact of which everyone here is aware. That is not a trait exclusive to Woodard. Any Wikipedia editor who knows me can attest to the fact that I am not Woodard. Any WP:CHECKUSER will make it quite obvious I am not Woodard.

Also, I was not the person who added the "aesthetic fascinations of Woodard", or suggested that. [3]. That was 1904.CC.

I am saying that we cannot prove anything on his website since it is not accessible to the public and we have no archive.org captures of it, and linking readers to a website with nothing on it is useless. Was there stuff on the website in the past? Yes, I never disputed that. But we have no way to link to it so showing readers a blank screen is not helpful. The consensus on Wikipedia is that archive.today is not trustworthy and cannot be linked.

Also, I highly doubt he started a website in 1989, unless he worked at CERN. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

also, not that this needs further evidence, but Woodard socks typically haven't edited the topics Para does - they often edit topics that Woodard is personally passionate about, like inserting mentions of himself into random articles, Czech classical music, and his wife. ... sawyer * any/all * talk 12:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Launchballer 12:03, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Launchballer 12:03, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jerome Drayton 1977.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. REAL 💬 ⬆ 16:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Unknown French boy is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]