Editing stats for Ottava Rima at 03:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC):

General user info
Username: Ottava Rima
First edit: Sep 20, 2007 16:22:38
Unique articles edited: 1,383
Average edits per page: 6.52
Live edits: 9,067

Namespace totals
Article	2082	22.96%
Talk	941	10.38%
User	261	2.88%
User talk	2726	30.07%
Wikipedia	1920	21.18%
Wikipedia talk	735	8.11%
File	107	1.18%
Template	28	0.31%
Template talk	229	2.53%
Category	38	0.42%

Month counts
2007/09	3	
2007/10	0	
2007/11	0	
2007/12	4	
2008/01	75	
2008/02	94	
2008/03	418	
2008/04	773	
2008/05	207	
2008/06	482	
2008/07	1234	
2008/08	1108	
2008/09	654	
2008/10	581	
2008/11	397	
2008/12	978	
2009/01	708	
2009/02	634	
2009/03	712	
2009/04	5	

Logs
Pages moved: 45
Pages patrolled: 27
Files uploaded: 87

Top edited articles
Article

    * 299 - Samuel_Johnson
    * 104 - Drapier's_Letters
    * 65 - The_Lucy_poems
    * 63 - Christopher_Smart
    * 58 - Henry_Fielding's_early_plays
    * 44 - Samuel_Johnson's_early_life
    * 41 - 18th_century
    * 28 - Sermons_of_Dean_Swift
    * 25 - Nicolò_Giraud
    * 25 - De_Doctrina_Christiana_(Milton)


Talk

    * 165 - Samuel_Johnson
    * 81 - Nicolò_Giraud
    * 57 - Deinonychus
    * 52 - The_Lucy_poems
    * 40 - Rosalind_Picard
    * 25 - Ludovico_Ariosto
    * 25 - Clover_(creature)
    * 23 - Hillary_Rodham_Clinton
    * 23 - Drapier's_Letters
    * 21 - Roman_Catholic_Church


User

    * 71 - Ottava_Rima
    * 36 - Ottava_Rima/DYK
    * 19 - Ottava_Rima/WATCH
    * 16 - Ottava_Rima/Keats
    * 11 - Ottava_Rima/Printers
    * 9 - Ottava_Rima/Johnson_contributors
    * 9 - Ottava_Rima/Johnson
    * 7 - Ottava_Rima/Byron
    * 6 - Ottava_Rima/Sermons
    * 5 - Ottava_Rima/A


User talk

    * 629 - Ottava_Rima
    * 252 - SandyGeorgia
    * 176 - Malleus_Fatuorum
    * 94 - Ceoil
    * 87 - Awadewit
    * 48 - Gatoclass
    * 43 - Geogre
    * 37 - Raul654
    * 34 - Karanacs
    * 32 - I'm_Spartacus!


Wikipedia

    * 400 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
    * 112 - Featured_article_candidates/Samuel_Johnson
    * 66 - Village_pump_(policy)
    * 64 - Administrators'_noticeboard
    * 33 - Featured_article_candidates/Samuel_Johnson's_early...
    * 31 - Reliable_sources/Noticeboard
    * 31 - Featured_article_candidates/The_Drapier's_Letters/...
    * 27 - Featured_article_candidates/Greece_Runestones
    * 26 - Fringe_theories/Noticeboard
    * 23 - Featured_article_candidates/The_Lucy_poems/archive...


Wikipedia talk

    * 315 - Did_you_know
    * 66 - Requests_for_adminship
    * 52 - Featured_article_candidates
    * 50 - No_legal_threats
    * 22 - Featured_article_candidates/Roman_Catholic_Church/...
    * 20 - WikiProject_Poetry
    * 19 - Copyright_problems
    * 18 - WikiProject_Freemasonry
    * 18 - Unreviewed_featured_articles
    * 16 - Featured_article_candidates/Samuel_Johnson


File

    * 4 - Hilliad_balance.png
    * 3 - Johnson_Preface.jpg
    * 2 - Drapiers_Letter_3.JPG
    * 2 - FieldingAmelia.png
    * 2 - Christopher_Smart_Pembroke_portrait.JPG
    * 2 - Drapiers_Letter_4.JPG
    * 2 - Abimelech_01.jpg
    * 2 - Hilliad_Title.png
    * 2 - Art_of_Ingeniously_Tormenting2.png
    * 2 - Hilliad_Account.png


Template

    * 14 - Samuel_Johnson
    * 4 - Christopher_Smart
    * 3 - John_Milton
    * 3 - Henry_Fielding
    * 1 - LB_Wandsworth
    * 1 - DYKclerk
    * 1 - DYKclerk/doc
    * 1 - Did_you_know/Next_update


Template talk

    * 225 - Did_you_know
    * 4 - Samuel_Johnson


Category

    * 3 - Poetry_by_Samuel_Johnson
    * 2 - Works_by_Samuel_Johnson
    * 2 - Essay_collections_by_Samuel_Johnson
    * 2 - Streathamites
    * 2 - Poetry_by_Christopher_Smart
    * 1 - 1765_poems
    * 1 - Christopher_Smart
    * 1 - 1753_poems
    * 1 - 1738_poems
    * 1 - Works_by_Jane_Collier

The following was moved from the page, preserved in full. Ottava Rima (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. A strange way to thank Ottava for his support at your most recent RfC. Ah well. --Malleus Fatuorum 22:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   • I do thank Ottava Rima for supporting me, along with most others, in the recent attempt of FAC editors to have me blocked as a means of discrediting my opinion as an editor in an FAC for an article that I was a major editor and is now an FA. However, perhaps because of the nastiness of those behind that RFC, I am especially sensitive when formal procedures are used to retaliated against an editor for an editorial opinion. Thus my distaste with filing a sock puppet report in order to demean Fowler&Fowler for his comments on an article, with which OR disagreed, although the editors of the article agreed with Fowler&Fowler and have since solicited his help with the article. I am sorry that you want to bring up my RFC here, in a similar attempt to discredit my Oppose in this RFA. Similar tactics on your part, Malleus, do not become you. I think all such maneuvers are ugly. (I knew when I voted I was risking such a comment from you. Such behavior from OR's supporters do not further his cause. You are doing exactly what I object to in OR: attemping to slander an editor to discredit an opinion or vote.) —Mattisse (Talk) 23:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   I suggest that you have a good night's sleep, and then look up the word "slander" in your dictionary. --Malleus Fatuorum 00:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   Slander, "words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another". Mattisse's words don't seem false, and I don't think OR's reputation has been damaged at all. Unless you meant a legal definition of slander, but that is not relevant here. Chillum 00:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   Are you pretending to be dense to make some kind of point, or for a bet? It seemed quite plain that Mattisse was accusing me of slander, not Ottava. --Malleus Fatuorum 00:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   You misunderstand, Malleus. I was accusing you both of it. The behavior is the same. Surround a person with false, misleading accusations or statements so as to discredit their opinion on a particular point. Applies whether is is accusations of sockpuppetry or bringing up a malicious RFC. Same behavior with the malicious intent to discredit. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   I suppose I was being dense, not to make a point, I simply misunderstood your words. They were ambiguous, now that you have clarified them I retract my preceding statement. Chillum 00:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   Malleus. Don't try to make others look the fool. It is just another means you typically use to discredit another's opinion. Also an ugly tactic on your part. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   (out) I don't want to get involved in arguing over "slander", but I do want to echo Mattisse's concern about the recent sockpuppet accusation. Accusing opponents of sock puppeteering or general "ethical"　problems seems to be common behavior for Ottava; less than two months ago, for example, he was accusing me of socking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Disease Day, and rather than file a real RFCU (which would have shown immediately that he was wrong) he just continued to throw around accusations in the AfD discussion in attempt to discredit me. I cannot see how this sort of behavior could ever be permissible in an admin; just from glancing here, it seems Ottava has already made two frivolous sockpuppet accusations, which is two more than a user in good standing should have. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 00:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   May I add that the Fowler&fowler accusation was particularly egregious. Not just because anyone who has seen F&f at work knows that he has no need for sock puppets in making his case but also because the nominee went out of his/her way to look for IP editing patterns in the hope of finding socks. I'm generally impressed by OR's demeanor in this RfA but the F&f thing is what prevents me from supporting and I'm not surprised that Matisse, who has a lot more experience working with both F&f as well as OR, prefers to oppose. --RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 01:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]