Main page | Assessment | Help | Members | Noticeboard | Portal | Recognized content |
WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago |
---|
![]() |
Welcome to the assessment department of Trinidad and Tobago WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Trinidad and Tobago, its governments, people, geography, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Trinidad and Tobago articles by quality and Category:Trinidad and Tobago articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of Trinidad and Tobago WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
Quality assessment
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | ![]() |
|
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | ![]() |
|
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | ![]() |
|
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | ![]() |
|
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Trinidad and Tobago articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scale
Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Trinidad and Tobago articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Trinidad and Tobago articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Trinidad and Tobago articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Trinidad and Tobago articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Trinidad and Tobago articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Trinidad and Tobago articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Trinidad and Tobago.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Richard Thompson (athlete) NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 07:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Colin Robinson (activist) Bklibcat67 - Talk
Assessment log
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
March 9, 2025
Assessed
- Draft:Tianna Guy (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
March 7, 2025
Assessed
- Category:High commissioners of Jamaica to Trinidad and Tobago (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
- National Petroleum Staff Association (talk) removed.
March 6, 2025
Assessed
- Embassy of Trinidad and Tobago, Washington, D.C. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
You must be logged in to post a comment.