The WikiProject Jewish history article assessment system is used to rate and improve articles under WP Jewish history. We use the standard Wikipedia rating system, as follows:

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Jewish history project banner on the article's talk page. Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Jewish history-related articles. At present, there are over ? Jewish history articles that need assessment (e.g., that need to have a class inserted in the class parameter of the template).

Jewish history-related articles to be assessed have some aspects of the template on their talk page, but the template may be incomplete. First, select an article from the list at Category:Unassessed Jewish history-related articles. Then, look over the article in anticipation of filling out the parameters of the Jewish history template. Next, replace the WikiProject Jewish history template on the article talk page with the following:

{{WikiProject Jewish history
|nested =
|small=
|class=
|importance=}}

The above {{WikiProject Jewish history}} template has all the answers that you will need for most situations. From your review of the article, delete those answers and parameters that do not fit the article. Then, fill in the listas parameter (e.g., last name, first name), then save. And, you are done!

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Jewish history}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Jewish history-related articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Jewish history-related articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Jewish history-related articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Jewish history-related articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Jewish history-related articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Jewish history-related articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Jewish history-related articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Jewish history-related articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Jewish history-related articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Draft
FM (for featured media only; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Jewish history-related pages)		FM
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Jewish history-related pages)		File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Jewish history-related pages)		Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Jewish history-related pages)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Jewish history-related articles)		???

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Jewish history}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.