The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

(0/4/0); Closed per WP:NOTNOW at 05:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC) by Tiptoety ^talk

Wael.Mogherbi (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Wael.Mogherbi (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I will mainly be active in WP:FB/TAFV (Taskforce on Association Football variants), WP:FB/ITF (Football/Italy task force) and WP:VB (Volleyball)

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I mainly worked in three areas on Wikipedia 1. Futsal-related articles, 2. Volleyball-related articles and 3. Italian football-related articles especially the clubs. But lately i'm working on Futsal-related articles and i'm trying to improve the articles or create any non-existed articles

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Actually i didn't, in the future i'll try to avoid any conflicts over editing, but if its happened some how i and the other person will figure out what the best for wikipedia and we'll try to do it

Extra optional question from Patton123

4 Why do you want to be a Wikipedia administrator?

A:

• Links for Wael.Mogherbi: Wael.Mogherbi (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Wael.Mogherbi before commenting.

• You odn't need to be an admin to take part in improving arrticles. Suggest withdrawal at this stage.--Patton^t/c 23:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Seconded. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 23:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Agreed. America69 (talk) 00:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I strongly encourage withdrawing, mainly because based on your answers you don't need the tools and plus you wrote no opening statement.--Giants27 TC 01:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed. Before you can successfully run for this job, you need to be familiar with admin-ish areas including how the RFA process works. Consider getting an admin coach or learn through self-study. By transcluding this before it was ready you demonstrated carelessness, which is a major negative from the start. I recommend withdrawing for at least 3 months. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose Per WP:SNOW, please look at WP:ADMIN and previous successful RFA's for what and admin is and what the community looks for, because admins do not help out wikiprojects with their tools.--Giants27 TC 00:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose Suggest WP:SNOW. The answers to the questions are vague. Suggest you take the advice of Giant27 as well. America69 (talk) 00:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose Snow cannot be determined until after people follow a way. The appropriate term is "Not Now". Regardless. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 01:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose. Yep, SNOW, sorry :(. Bsimmons666 (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.