The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (1/3/0); Ended 05:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) - Closed by non-bureaucrat –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 05:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW[reply]

MyspaceMan12 (talk · contribs) – I nominated this user myself MyspaceMan12 (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I accept:Hello all Wikipedians, I hope to have your support in my request to become an admin. I know I havent been on Wikipedia very long but I believe I know alot about the way Wikipedia is ran.

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I hope to take part in as much administrative work as I possibly can. Especially trying my hardest to remove vandalism and help out

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I would say my best contributions to Wikipedia is my continuous edits to Bossier Parish School Board and my creation of Benton Middle School article. I think they are my best because I have tried my hardest to pour my heart and soul into those edits and all my edits

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I got in an argument with ThePeepShow. It didn't really cause me any stress the conflict worked itself out quickly

• Links for MyspaceMan12: MyspaceMan12 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/USERNAME before commenting.

1. I don't think I should run if I don't vote for myself. Please Vote --MyspaceMan12 (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Weak support. 3/4 of your edits are in the User: and User talk: areas. That's not something I generally like to see, and I would suggest working on articles rather then tidying your userpage is you wish to be an admin in the future. Wizardman 05:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose. I appreciate your enthusiasm and your work so far, but there isn't enough yet for me to accurately assess your knowledge of policies and procedures. Useight (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose. Per WP:NOTNOW. MBisanz ^talk 05:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Regretful Oppose Sorry; per Useight and WP:NOTNOW. -download | sign! 05:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.