The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Benis (song) → Rae Sremmurd  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target page. PamD 22:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As far as I can tell, nobody has recorded a song about the various nonsense slang words for male genitalia. Certainly not this group. 06:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)CoffeeWithMarkets (talk)
• Delete as per nom Chetsford (talk) 22:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Adventure Log → Final Fantasy XI  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There exists a card game called One Piece: Adventure Log and the term is also used in such games as BOTW. It's an overly generic term that should probably be deleted as it has no clear target. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom as vague. There's also Dungeon Masters Adventure Log AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. This is far too vague. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to vagueness --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Mooch, as the requested retarget was another redirect. (non-admin closure) --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Moocher → wiktionary:Special:Search/moocher  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I really don't see what the point of this soft redirect is. Why does this word merit a redirect to wiktionary over any of the other thousands of words there and not here? SmartSE (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Conversely, I don't see the point of deleting it._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mooch (disambiguation) as with Mooching. The main one I would associate with moocher would be Minnie the Moocher, but there are also entries for Moocher McDuck in Clan McDuck and Moochers (film) (not sure if the last one is that notable). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Jewish life in Mexico → Judaism in Mexico  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Delete. It is not clear why the redirect was created in the first place, as there's no need for it at all: No article or redirect named "Jewish life in" another country exists, no article links to the page, and it has zero daily views. Shalom11111 (talk) 20:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As per above, article adds no value to Wikipedia. Rangasyd (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete' per nom so as not to set off a "(religious) life in (country)" precedent. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Grenz, Egon → Egon Krenz  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Procedural nomination of a closed AfD. Rationale was "Grenz, Egon redirects to Egon Krenz. But Grenz is not a frequent misspelling of his name." power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Redirect has existed for nearly 14 years so it's obviously not harmful, but if you look at the history it was clearly created in error. Misspellings are viable redirects but I don't think that should extend to sort names. —Xezbeth (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak rename to Egon Grenz. The way it is phrased, it seems more like a location like Grenz is a village in Egon. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget Comparison shopping to Shopping#Pricing and negotiation and Price comparison to Pricing. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comparison shopping → Comparison shopping website  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Price comparison → Comparison shopping website  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

This nomination also includes Price comparison, another redirect to the same target, and my reasoning is the same.

Delete. Comparison shopping is a much broader topic than merely something related to a kind of website; this is vaguely like redirecting Travel agency (if we didn't have an article on the topic) to Online travel agency, because in both situations we have or would have a broad topic being pointed specifically to an online variant thereof. See WP:RFD#DELETE point #2; this redirect might make confuse you by making you think that comparison shopping is just an online thing, for example. Since we don't have an article on the general concept of comparison shopping, we ought not pretend that this article covers the concepts of comparison shopping or price comparisons; it ought to be red unless there's an article that I've not found that really does cover the concept, rather than websites that perform such a service. Nyttend backup (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak target to Shopping#Pricing_and_negotiation There isn't really a section that discusses particular methods of comparison shopping, but this would at least give the user a starting point and the ideas of bartering and negotiation as well as going to price comparison websites. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget - Price comparison seems like it should go to either 'Pricing' itself or some specific section within in it. I guess I'm neutral as far as the other one goes. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'm fine with retargeting to a reasonable location. Nyttend backup (talk) 22:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Sky Does Minecraft → List of most-subscribed YouTube channels  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

WP:R#DELETE 10. The redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. Zoom (talk page) 17:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I don't see it on the list? Did it get bumped off? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment When I created the redirect, the channel was indeed listed in the target article, but was removed after leaving the top fifty. At this point, I wouldn't be opposed to its deletion. LifeofTau 06:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete for now due to no longer discussed in the article --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Uncontroversial maintenance ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• GFW Global Championship (current) → Impact World Championship  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The world "current" in the title gives the impression that it will become outdated. Also, the reason for the revert move says "utterly unacceptable title", which means that this title will become inaccurate. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The redirect was the result of a bad move that violated all sorts of article titling policies and guidelines performed by an editor with a history of failing to follow proper procedures and creating such pointless messes. It was fixed within minutes. Of course, it was also part of a mess around the proper title due to the company being in upheaval (as explained in the Impact Wrestling article), but this redirect was probably the worst possible result of that mess. oknazevad (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, housekeeping AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is not how we title PW championship articles. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. - TNT^❤ 19:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Terrible terrible damage → Blizzard Entertainment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as patent nonsense.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's an attackish redirect WikiVirusC^(talk) 16:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nonsense redirect. Super Ψ Dro 17:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a quote from one of the game directors for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty, but he doesn't have a page here. It was integrated into the series as a quote for several challenges. [1] But other than that, it's a non-notable meme that hasn't gotten any notable coverage in news sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete an obscure fan meme. Non-notable quote from the actual game though --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Unlikely punctuation ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• World Of Warcraft:- Rogue → Gameplay of World of Warcraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The very strange punctuation here makes it implausible as a redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as attempt to WP:WIKIA the World of Warcraft articles by expanding to multiple types of character classes. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Livres (political party) → Social Liberal Party (Brazil)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Livres (Brazil) → Social Liberal Party (Brazil)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Free (Brazil) → Social Liberal Party (Brazil)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Livres is a social liberal movement (not a political party) and Social Liberal Party is social conservative party. It makes sense, doesn't it? 179.99.159.161 (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Red link Livres was originally created as a wing of the Social Liberal Party, but the entire organization quit the party when they chose Jair Bolsonaro as their presidential candidate, and the organization is now totally separate.^[1] However, Livres is likely a worthy topic for an article, so I recommend deleting these redirects to encourage article creation. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• List of weapons in the Armored Core series → Armored Core  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I think it is obvious why this isn't a plausible redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (list of gameplay weapons) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since wiki is not a game guide --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted. as G7, the nominator is also the author of the redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Black panther the album music from and inspiered by → Black Panther (soundtrack)#Black Panther: The Album  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Redirect created in error, spelling error Richiekim (talk) 01:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per R3; tagged as such. Honestly this should have been the route to go from the start, no need to start a discussion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.