The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARSHentry1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to be from a printed source. Eeekster (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historic West Martin Street in Raleigh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence image is in public domain. Kelly ^hi! 00:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Concord 1930s.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence for PD claim. Kelly ^hi! 02:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F2 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minolta Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This upload did not work correctly. Please delete Illinois2011 (talk) 03:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dakota Marker.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 03:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:M. E. Church, Frederick, SD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unverifiable source/copyright. Kelly ^hi! 03:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Standingbearlake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source. Kelly ^hi! 04:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• This picture is on the website of the US corps of engineers. The picture is in the public domain being that it belongs to the USACE. Here is the link to the website source:

Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Home Page User:goodman5million

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zorinsky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No verifiable source. Kelly ^hi! 04:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• This picture is on the website of the US corps of engineers. The picture is in the public domain being that it belongs to the USACE. Here is the link to the website source:

Omaha District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Home Page User:goodman5million —Preceding undated comment added 01:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Civil tur .tif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The text says "Photograph of Miguel Civil, taken in the early 1960s. Anonymous photographer and unknown source." Therefore it is NOT PD-self and there is no good arguments that is should be PD. MGA73 (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This photo has circulated among colleagues and students at the Oriental Institute (Univ. of Chicago) for many decades. It seems to have been taken ca. 1961, but no one knows who took it, and it has never been published, and it has no owner: it exists in many copies individuals who studied or worked with Civil have. There is absolutely no basis to assume that there is any copyright issue here at all. The photos was most likely part of a series of photos that included Civil and Samuel Noah Kramer, one of which (but not this one!) appeared in Kramer's memoirs, In the World of Sumer (Detroit: Wayne State Univ. Pr., 1988), p. 206. BUT, I must insist, this is not the same photo (in Kramer's book, Civil is smoking a pipe, but not in the Wikipedia one). What else you want me to do?? After 50 years no one knows who took the photo, or even exactly when (1961?, 1962?), or even who owns or has the negative, if this even exists. Is this enough? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.54.68.69 (talk) 10:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This will horrify you but if the photo has not been published and the photographer is unknown, this image will not become Public Domain until 120 years after the photo was taken.[1] Maybe it could be retained as "fair use" but since the subject is still alive I doubt whether that would be permitted. Better to ask the subject for a photograph and ask him to release it under a suitable licence. Easiest bureaucratically: take a photo yourself and upload it. It that possible? Thincat (talk) 11:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Afterthought: if the photo (or any other photo) was just a snapshot taken non-professionally at Professor Civil's request, Civil would probably hold copyright and he could license its use here. Thincat (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Isidro History.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a scan of a document. The source is stated to be "Philippine National Archive" so I doubt that uploader wrote the document. Same with
• File:San Isidro History 02.jpg and
• File:San Isidro History 03.jpg

So who created the original document? When? MGA73 (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nadone - Deperimento dell'ambiente.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maxxxband.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says "own work by uploader", "work by someone other than the uploader" and "used under permission", although no evidence of permission is provided. Stefan2 (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blogscope-front-page.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Print screen from a website / program. No proof that it is free. MGA73 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flavour-nabania.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There used to be a link to https://hiphopsouth.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/leak-flavour-nabania-baby-oku/ so it seems that this is not own work. MGA73 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IWATriState.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It seems to be a logo and it is too complex to be PD-ineligible so I doubt it is free. MGA73 (talk) 13:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GSRakovskiAcademyBadge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of (probably) copyrighted badge, therefore probably unfree. Bulwersator (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:City of Columbia Heights Public Library 1953.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Obtained from the public archives of the Columbia Heights Historical Society." + PD-user Bulwersator (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inside the Centre for NSQI.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "and the image is owned by the Centre for NSQI" Bulwersator (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MPonsot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No proof of permission. Not sure uploader is active so take it here instead. MGA73 (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на комплекс Москва-сити.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably copyvio. The uploader lists this site as source, but I can't find it there. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Badly search!) This image there has number 20! Check up. Texmon (talk) 23:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Still no indication that the image is free, though. The copyright notice at the bottom suggests the contrary. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Billingsley Map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of the map. Who made it? Any reason why this should be PD? -user: Uconngijoe MGA73 (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I took the picture and posted it in the article for Billingsley village, UK. Please recommend or provide a more appropriate tag. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.155.65.226 (talk) 23:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Without information about who the map designer is, the file would have to be deleted since we can't tell whether it is copyrighted or not. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyland Whales Apple Valley MN.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mural in Apple Valley, Minnesota, USA. FOP in USA covers buildings but is this mural covered? MGA73 (talk) 21:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_February_24#File:PortsmouthWhalingWall.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princes-Street-Gardens.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded 4 files with on first day of activity in years, each image has a commericial link included, different cameras used, included all 4 files in articles Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:St-andrews-castle.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded 4 files with on first day of activity in years, each image has a commericial link included, different cameras used, included all 4 files in articles Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boats-canal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded 4 files with on first day of activity in years, each image has a commericial link included, different cameras used, included all 4 files in articles Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edinburgh-Castle.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded 4 files with on first day of activity in years, each image has a commericial link included, different cameras used, included all 4 files in articles Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all 4 images, 2 cameras. The photo taken with a Minolta camera is from 2005 while the Casio ones are from 2008 according to the EXIF. A low-resolution version of the St Andrews Castle image appears here, i.e. on a page under the domain in the edit summary. Presumably, all of the pictures can be find if you search a bit.

--Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Copyrishted image found here: http://jbanaciski.deviantart.com/art/Edinburgh-Castle-Scotland-125186464 -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.