The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Trivia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

WP:NOTWEBHOST - this appears to be misusing Wikipedia as a web host - user space is not the place for random facts but for collaboration on Wikipedia articles as well as testing of templates and the like. WP:USERPAGE Some of the claims this page makes as well also seem to be intended at creating division in the community, and do not line up with Wikipedia's, and largely Wikimedia's, goals. Aasim (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please elaborate on how this page is "intended to cause division in the community" WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WeaponizingArchitecture: Out of curiosity, why are you banned from the discord server? SN54129 — Review here please :) 17:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: i actually don't know. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 17:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, can we talk about this later? i'm at school and im not in the mood to handle this right now. I think maybe 4:30 PM EST would be a decent timeframe. Thanks WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - no need to find/nominate people's goofy userspace pages. something Wikipe-tan-related that's no less related to Wikipedia than any other use of that embarrassing bit of wikiculture. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if there wasn’t a huge annoying message at the top this would be your typical silly joke userpage. There’s nothing offensive here besides that and it’s humor related to the project. Maybe add a “humor” tag so it doesn’t come across as vandalism. Dronebogus (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment You did see that the main image is called File:DieAViolentDeth.png? I guess that is considered funny if one is in school. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:55, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Liz: I already requested the file to be renamed. Plus, theres a pretty slim chance someone using wikipedia for school would go to a sandbox which is marked with the humorous template. WeaponizingArchitecture | talk to me 06:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.