- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No clear consensus after multiple relistings. The Bushranger One ping only 09:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yu Mi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be fictional -- the Japanese Wikipedia article indicates that references could be found in the Records of the Three Kingdoms biographies for Sun Ce and Liu Yao (warlord), but I can't find any references to him in either of those two biographies. Not a particularly significant character in the fictional Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 17:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He is historical, references to him can be found in Rafe de Crespigny's Biographical Dictionary (p. 998) and Generals of the South (pp. 158, 161) and under Sun Ce's biography in the Records of the Three Kingdoms - you probably couldn't find him because Wikisource's faulty simplified-to-traditional Chinese converter turned his name into 於麋.... _dk (talk) 02:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tried that. Still not there. --Nlu (talk) 04:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That's strange, I've found him here. Two mentions in the paragraph that starts with 壽春,術已據之,繇乃渡江治曲阿。_dk (talk) 04:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tried that. Still not there. --Nlu (talk) 04:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Here: (繇遣樊能、於麋東屯橫江津,張英屯當利口,以距術。) and in the Jiangbiao Zhuan annotation (江表傳曰: ... 因渡江攻禮,禮突走,而樊能、於麋等複合眾襲奪牛渚屯。) LDS contact me 06:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment With that being the case, part of my rationale for deletion is obviously gone. The notability issue remains, but obviously argument for deletion is much weaker. I'd like to see additional comments. --Nlu (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm neutral, for now. In the near future, I'll start a mass AFD for several non-notable historical persons on this list, especially those who are mentioned very briefly in historical records. However, I need to settle the fictional characters list first. (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheng Yuanzhi) If Yu Mi still exists by then, I'll consider including him in the mass AFD. LDS contact me 15:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 22:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 03:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
You must be logged in to post a comment.