The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Avro Vulcan XH558. Randykitty (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vulcan To The Sky Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The trust is not as noteworthy as the aircraft it has restored - Avro Vulcan XH558. This entire article is summed up in a line from the XH558 page: "It is operated by the Vulcan to the Sky Trust as a display aircraft, funded entirely by charitable donations and the UK Heritage Lottery Fund." All the information regarding the operation of this trust is already on the XH558 page and their is no need to keep this one. Nathan121212 (talk) 19:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge or redirect to Avro Vulcan XH558. Artw (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to Avro Vulcan XH558. EricSerge (talk) 00:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & redirect to Avro Vulcan XH558, subject is about a specific non-notable (yet) surviving aircraft of the subject of the article Avro Vulcan XH558. Therefore, until the specific aircraft receives significant coverage sufficient to pass WP:GNG, summarize verified content, and merge into parent article. No prejudice against recreating article about the specific aircraft if it can meet GNG in the future.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• I support redirecting but I can find no useful content in the nominated article worth merging. All noteworthy details are already written in the XH558 article. Nathan121212 (talk) 20:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.