The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Coren ^(talk) 02:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspeakable Vault (of Doom) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Rather well-written article, but the subject does not yet meet notability guidelines. The included references are all from blogs or from sources with commercial relationships with the comic. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 15:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. I agree that this article is very informative, with multiple links within wikipedia and a good number of external ones as well. But given the fact that the references come from basically the same source, I find it hard pressed to give substantial reasons asking for the topic to be kept. A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 16:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. Nice article, real shame it doesn't meet notability, and not very well-referenced either. Calor (talk) 16:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A card game based on the webcomic has been produced by one independant notable game company and a board game based on the webcomic has been produced by a second notable game company. Edward321 (talk) 00:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As per reason given by Edward321. Horselover Frost (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Assuming Edward321's statement can be substantiated, keep. DS (talk) 00:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edward321 is right in that there is a card game and a board game. However, in my opinion that still does not convey notability, because it still hasn't received significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 06:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I just added some external references at the end of the article. But I fear they won't be more notable than the previous ones. I searched on the web and found many links to the UVoD webcomic, mainly in blogs or forums or simple link pages which won't be convenient for Wikipedia's policy. Also added a link to the French Wikipedia Article (not written by me) Bt4242 (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as above. WikiScrubber (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.