The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Article deleted as CSD:G7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaaron95 (talk • contribs) 11:12, 3 May 2015‎

Tipu-II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no reliable sources available to prove its existence. given reference talks about -shaheen missile test no mention of tipu.creator of this article maybe trying to promote pakistan's ballistic missile program. Nicky mathew (talk) 21:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT there is no proof of the existence of such missile, as only one/two defense forums speculated about such a missile. As there are still not enough proof for the existence of Tipu-I, the existence of Tipu-II maybe a blatant rumor (Maybe due to the interests/excitements in/about the program) .... --JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 03:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot find any verifiable evidence of the missiles existence (I.e industry sources), indeed, I cannot even find any mention of the missile in secondary sources. It does however appear to be well covered in some defence forums etc, so I would be inclined to think this missile is simply a community fabrication or rumour - something that certainly doesn't belong on Wikipedia. So i'd suggest delete due to it not meeting the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability. Antiochus the Great (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have deleted the article following a CSD:G7 (Author requests deletion) request. MilborneOne (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.