The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specialist Group Information Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not contain independent references. I do not think the subject is notable. PercyPigUK (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom. PercyPigUK (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not notable enough to meet WP:GNG and does not have significant coverage. The only available online sources at this time are self-published. Prof.PMarini (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I'm not seeing any independent sources to back it up, and it doesn't quite reach the level of importance for Wikipedia. Waqar💬 17:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.