The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rod Stoner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable; WP:SINGLEEVENT JenniferGovernment 11:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mr Stoner's complaints would likely be worth including in an article on the company, but not as a bio article of him. Nick-D (talk) 04:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Don't think there's enough to pass WP:GNG. Agree with Nick-D that his complaints would likely merit inclusion in an article on the company, but insufficient coverage for a stand-alone article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.