The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mortal Kombat Kollection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a compilation of three games which all have their own articles. The compilation can be named in those articles, if it's sufficiently notable, but doesn't require its own article. Can't be easily merged as there are three articles it references. Maccy69 (talk) 04:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A released game with sources; it doesn't matter if it's a compilation, if it has been released as a game on a major console it is notable. Nate • (chatter) 05:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Nifboy (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Being notable is important, despite what you think. Being "released on a major console" is not notable. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 06:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article is redundant, as it's not a new original game and instead just a rerelease of older titles that already have their own sections, in which this release can be mentioned. Therefore, there's nothing noteworthy to add, and just being released on "a major console" is not enough to warrant keeping it. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 08:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - re-release, not remake. There is not reason to have an article on different releases of the same products. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - mention of this compilation would be good for Mortal Kombat (series) and for the three games' articles in the compilation, but there's nothing new about this to deserve its own article. --Teancum (talk) 13:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete just a re-release. Maybe mention it in the series article, but re-releases don't get articles of their own. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As I am usually an inclusionist, this really doesn't warrant its own article. I'll simply mention this Kollection in the Mortal Kombat page and the respective articles of the games contained when I get the time. However, I have no clue how to place pictures and I believe the cover shot should be placed in the series page (however it should be greatly reduced). Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 19:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Might have been re-released on a console, but it's gives absolutely nothing else that is not mentioned in the other MK articles, except there's a pretty navbox, infobox, and a (non-free) image. –MuZemike 21:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mortal Kombat or Midway Games, as a viable search term. Marasmusine (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Mortal Kombat and put the information about the compliation onto the relevant articles' page. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not a new game, just a boxed set of reissued titles. Wikipedia would become bloated everytime someone makes a page for every single box set released. Jonny2x4 (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.