The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marrua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hard to understand, but I cannot find much evidence of notability or many good sources on Google. —fetch·comms 00:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unintelligible. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 12:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but wikify -- This seems to be about a Brazilian military vehicle. I would have thought this was notable. The problem is that it is a bad article that needs wikifying. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per Peterkingiron. Article needs work but subject would appear to be notable enough to sustain article. WP MILHIST notified. Mjroots (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move to Agrale Marruá. I'll see if I can edit it and clean it up. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 15:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The lack of ability to find info might have been because of the bad page name. The actual vehicle name seems to be Agrale Marruá, which turns up a fair bit of information - including trans-wiki links.

• Keep - an article being unintelligible is not a reason to delete it. This vehicle is clearly worthy of an article. Parsecboy (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move per The Bushranger, who has done sterling work fixing the issues with this article IMO. — AustralianRupert (talk) 07:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move – Bushranger has made this a decent article. – B.hotep •talk• 11:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further, I have gone ahead and moved it, and created a redirect from Agrale Marrua also. – B.hotep •talk• 11:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Good cleanup work makes this a viable article; it's now both clear and well-sourced. Kudos. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 20:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.