Mark E. Anderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the existing article states: "may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies". In my opinion as a current Coordinator of WikiProject Military History, this article should be deleted. Adamdaley (talk) 23:34, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:34, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Could I ask the nominator to expand on his rationale, as by his military rank, the subject technically seems to meet criterion 3 of WP:SOLDIER. PWilkinson (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. General officers, whether regular or reserve, are generally considered notable per WP:SOLDIER. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw. I would like this to be withdrawn due to WP:SOLDIER. Adamdaley (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.