The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to German Figure Skating Championships. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Vernekohl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Nothing since retirement. Google search yields nothing but wikis and scoring databases. PROD removed without explanation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to German Figure Skating Championships where her medal wins are mentioned. --Here2rewrite (talk) 22:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. Should not remain an article, per nom, but linked from multiple pages. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 07:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of figure skaters (men's singles). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Thompson (figure skater) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater despite one national championship win (for Great Britain). Nothing since retirement. Google search yields nothing but wikis, scoring databases, and one article mentioning that the European Championships where he finished in 25th place were held at the same rink where he trained. Big whoop. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Skating, and England. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect I deprodded this with the rationale "This should be merged or redirected, but there are several plausible targets and I don't know enough about the topic area to unilaterally decide which is best." and I stand by that comment. I oppose straight deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 12:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What merge or redirect target article are you suggesting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of figure skaters (men's singles), where he and his British title are mentioned. Geschichte (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Baalveer. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baalveer Returns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see it passes WP: GNG. All available sourcing are just about the actors. Proposing MERGE to Baalveer or DELETE. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:The article "Baalveer Returns" has been supported by many reliable sources, including Mid Day, The Tribune India, Aaj Tak, Abp news and The Times of India as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources It seems like Twinkle1990 has a personal enmity with Baalveer, so they are trying to delete all Balveer- related articles.
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect to Baalveer. Same here like Baalveer 3 and Baalveer 4 nomination. The sources do not have the quality and depth of coverage needed to warrant a page on this show. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Baalveer. Since the article is not passing, WP: GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please sign all comments in AFD discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Baalveer, as was done for part III and IV, if I am not mistaken.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nabhan family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to indicate that (1) this family has been covered as a family as opposed to individual members or that (2) the people name-checked in this article are actually part of the same family. Several sources are unreliable; a seemingly user-generated site with no named authors or sourcing information on family names, and the WP:USERGENERATED MyHeritage geneaology site. The remaining sources are primary sources or media profiles of individuals with this surname, but they give no coverage to the family or evidence of how (if at all) the individuals across Syria, Brazil, the United States and the Gaza Strip are related. Fails WP:GNG and, per WP:NOPAGE, there is nothing this page does that Nabhan cannot. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Brazil, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 04:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete precisely per nom. The sourcing is not suitable for a limited merge. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 07:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hazari Gonj Hamidia Fazil Madrasah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not demonstrate notability. Nothing indicates that this high school is notable in the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per @LibStar and @Vinegarymass911.

ADifferentMan (talk) 08:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 05:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Testing Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. --WikiLinuz (talk) 18:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is this article in no relation to test automation frameworks, to which I would say there is more GNG than what is presented in this? Conyo14 (talk) 16:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete @Conyo14: It appears that the article's subject is a specific collection of libraries for test automation. The concept behind test automation frameworks are covered on the existing page under a subheading. Given this, the specific collection of libraries present seem to fail WP:GNG. Manyyassin (talk) 06:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Got it, I would have to agree then: Delete. Conyo14 (talk) 06:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to NetBSD, if possible. I see a number of references to this test library - it seems to have significance. (Add "NetBSD" to the G-search to get relevant results.) However, it is not mentioned in the NetBSD article. Lamona (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lamona: While NetBSD does use this software, and this is what this software was developed for originally, it is still a generic piece of software. I think the details shown on this page would be mostly irrelevant on the NetBSD page. Manyyassin (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unit.js (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Cannot find reliable, secondary sources about the subject. --WikiLinuz (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, only finding primary sources and instructions. The article currently is mostly code samples. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Order of battle for campaign of northern and eastern Henan 1938. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Order of battle for campaign of northern and eastern Honan 1938 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Identical subject and content to Order of battle for campaign of northern and eastern Henan 1938, but with the Wade-Giles romanization of Henan ("Honan"). Can be safely turned into a redirect. SilverStar54 (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, China, and Japan. SilverStar54 (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. This is baffling. The same editor, User:Asiaticus, created the "Honan" version on 15 February 2007, and then created the "Henan" version on 2 April 2008? Did they forget they'd made one already and simply create a new version based on the same sources? There are slight discrepancies, but since the Henan version has better sourcing I favor keeping that one. Toadspike [Talk] 23:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect since this seems to be completely identical barring the romanization spelling Claire 26 (talk) 04:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per nom. Back in 2008, the search function did not work as well as it does now, and many duplicate articles were created. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure how this article should be kept. Support redirect. Dympies (talk) 02:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, identical topic and mostly content. Fulmard (talk) 05:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeroen Geerdink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable darts player. No coverage beyond darts databases. Per WP:SPORTCRIT. SL93 (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Netherlands. SL93 (talk) 23:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wouldn't go quite so far as to say no coverage, as there's bits and pieces in Dutch regional and local media from 2014 when he went to Lakeside (Tubantia (newspaper): 1, 2; RTV Oost 1, Omroep Almelo (a municipal radio/tv network from Almelo) 1, and probably if I go digging I might find another piece or two like that), but yeah, nothing that comes even close to passing WP:GNG from what I can see, looks like it's all "routine coverage of local/regional person doing something (mildly) interesting". AddWittyNameHere 00:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your vote. It's great to have one, either keep or delete, from someone who knows the language. I ran an online translator, and I see that the first source is a primary interview, and the others look to be trivial coverage of him in relation to updates on the competitions. SL93 (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the others look to be trivial coverage of him in relation to updates on the competitions - more or less, with the note that these sources likely as not wouldn't even have reported on the competition if not for the fact that two folks from the Twente region (Geerdink and the more well-known Christian Kist) took part in it. Still, trivial coverage sounds about right. AddWittyNameHere 00:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Falls short of the GNG. gidonb (talk) 05:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ruiz II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Chiefs of staff do not count as a political office for purposes of NPOL, and it doesn't seem like there is sufficient coverage to meet the standards of WP:BASIC unfortunately. Deprod by Clearfrienda, not sure which sources they were referring to, perhaps the AP? Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Arizona. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: In cases where there is some substantial coverage I usually object with PRODs in case there's a chance they can be kept. In this case, there's this local 12news.com article and this ktar.com article which both go WP:INDEPTH. There are some less-significant mentions in this NYT article, this kold.com article, and this azcentral.com article. I'd lean towards delete but it's a close call. Clearfrienda ^💬 16:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree with Clearfrienda that the sources provided are not SIGCOV. The 12News source is good, but the rest are routine announcements and/or based on press releases. Toadspike [Talk] 07:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The NYT is a name-check, the KTAR is routine "hey, look at this guy who got elected" stuff. The c12 is more in depth but is rather fluffy and doesn't have the air of a researched piece - it sounds like a restating of an interview. Lamona (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andile Witbooi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I can't even confirm his unfortunate death in a reliable source. JTtheOG (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Drama series. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kaafir (Pakistani TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find sign/in-depth coverage, such as reviews. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this, this and this. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: could be reasonably redirected to the page about the director if the one-paragraph appraisal im Dawn Humayun Saeed’s negative role in Kaafir actually made one feel disgusted by his character. This drama proved how his star quality and ability to reach to the audience never fails. The good vs. evil; directed by Shahid Shafaat gave us the story Shahan Ali Khan (Humayun Saeed) who is living a dual life; in front of his family he pretended to be virtuous but resorted to his evil and malicious side when away from them. The twists were woven captivatingly into the narrative although the play did go a little over board with its bold dialogues and settings. and this review (https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/hot-on-web/zee-5-kaafir-dia-mirza-mohit-raina) for example are is not judged sufficient. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mushy Yank, I'm fine with redirection. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Read the opening sentence, Zee 5's web series Kaafir is a historical drama that explores the inhuman situation of Pakistani prisoners in India. So it is a web series of Zee5, not related to ARY drama. Redirect is the way. 2A04:4A43:920F:F722:28B7:A2BE:8E49:C6C3 (talk) 19:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks, 2A04:4A43:920F:F722:28B7:A2BE:8E49:C6C3, indeed, silly me. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per Mushy Yank provided source, also easily passes WP:NTV, broadcasted on national television channel ARY Digital. Libraa2019 (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Libraa2019, But NTV is an essay, not a policy. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Caution: Arguing with and sometimes just commenting on each individual who disagrees with you risks moving in a disruptive direction.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per Saqib and Mushy. The Quint article is about a different web series and there is nothing in-depth in reliable refs. 188.30.176.151 (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please provide a redirect target article if that is the option you are arguing for.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Target: If redirect is chosen Shahid Shafaat#Television (director) is imv the best target. List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital#Drama_series is another possible option. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital#Drama_series Saqib (talk) 20:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Mushy Yank & significant coverage found as listed above. 2404:3100:140A:E94E:1:0:1502:71AA (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2404:3100:140A:E94E:1:0:1502:71AA, Hello again - OK and where is that significant coverage listed above? All I see is just one single coverage which is not enough for GNG. — Saqib (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital#Drama_series: a couple sentences is not SIGCOV which is the most I see in the sources. S0091 (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Kova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The significance of the person is not visible in WP: MUSIC. Among the links are her official website and social networks.--Анатолий Росдашин (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Beauty pageants, Russia, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marais Schmidt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 22:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 22:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. CSD G5 Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CW 24 News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CW 24 News doesn't exist. Its existence is fabricated on several global Wikipedia and Wikiquote national pages, by two users (sock puppets or meat puppets) GQO and Beach Mirco Viejo and a few IP addresses (196.135.135.177, 154.187.210.6, 196.150.237.159, 196.135.169.232, 196.150.148.109, 154.189.72.22), since May 2024. Even the CW24News.com domain has only been established in April 2024 (for a newspaper that supposedly exists since 1973 and was co-founded by Anwar Sadat. All of the links and supporting info turned out to be nonsense. The cw24news.com website looks pretty real, until you see that it was created in Wordpress, and that the social media links are all phony (going to the template creator). Also: the Media Ownership Monitor doesn't show CW 24 News ownership by Egypt Media Group. Note also that there are a number of "CW 24 News" "logos" in Commons that seem to be completely made up by these perpetrators. I realize that this is cross-wiki spam, but I don't know how to easily make this into a cross-wiki "case". Any help in this respect will be appreciated. _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 20:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Egypt. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, I actually created this article I added secondary sources and information from the memory sites of the attached site. Search in those formulas and see the result of this search -en- (CW24 News) --------------------search - ar - (سي دبليو 24 أخبار)

CW24 News (Arabic: سي دبليو 24 أخبار)

(GQO (talk) 23:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC))[reply]

• Delete possible hoax. The Egyptian cw24news dot com was created this year.[1] The domain name was previously an unrelated Bangladesh news site. The BBC's Egyptian media guide does not mention it.[2] The Library of Congress guide does not mention it.[3] The FeedSpot news aggregator does not list it.[4] The biography of Anwar Sadat: Visionary Who Dared does not mention it.[5] Anwar Sadat's autobiography In Search of Identity does not mention it, even though it does mention the unrelated al-Gumhuriah (The Republic) that Sadat founded and briefly edited in the 50s (p. 136).[6] Even if it is not a hoax, it would not meet the notability threshold without any coverage in WP:RS. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  A note: view the source code of my post for html comments to see the archive.org link to the old website. Wikipedia's blacklist prevented me from including a linked url containing "CW24news.com". Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Obvious spam/hoax. And, imo, you can add Mahmushij and Paula Fenness to that list of sock puppets. MLTRock (talk) 02:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Question. According to Wikidata there are a total of 11 Wikipedia and 3 Wikiquote pages across the languages. Looking at the history page of the Wikidata entry, some were removed early May and recreated afterwards. Is there an easy way to address all language versions? _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 16:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete: Given that this is now a proved cross-wiki hoax, and the sock puppets have all been globally banned, I think this now qualifies for speedy deletion. _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 17:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• ? Who is the master account of this farm? Yann (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Meta entry listed three possible master accounts: AZ112233, M_W_T_WMV, Ahmed_brens. _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 16:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really Cool Airlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was prod by Drmies as "Lousy sourcing full of announcements for something that may or may not exist a half a year from now." This is not notable, the sources are over a year old and the "airline" isn't even flying and the three sources for the proposed date are word for word (reads as if it was a PR). This can be undeleted if it ever gets off the ground. Bidgee (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Bidgee (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Thailand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and drmies's judgment on what's cool. tedder (talk) 03:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Cool or not, this is WP:TOOSOON. Not even in operation and references are churnalism. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool for future ventures. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete As per above. MaskedSinger (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above and WP:NOTPROMO. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Patee Sarasin, which I just created, for now. There's plenty of news coverage, but as of now there's not much info apart from what's been announced by the company, and what's independently verifiable is mostly about its founder. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging Bidgee, Tedder, CNMall41, MaskedSinger and User:Rosbif73 in case the above suggestion changes their opinion. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I wouldn't object strongly to a redirect to Patee Sarasin#Later ventures, but I don't think it's necessary. There are no incoming links to Really Cool Airlines (apart from the lists of A330/A350 operators, where the mentions are unsourced). If the airline gets off the ground, its article can be re-created. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify. Would expect a Thai subject would require deeper local language digging. Could be dynamic given recency. Hyperbolick (talk) 08:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elyria-Lorain Broadcasting Co. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP. Let'srun (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Radio, Companies, and Ohio. Let'srun (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Cannot find any significant coverage of this company per WP:ORGCRIT. It was the subject of an antitrust case in the 1960s that gets cited in future cases, but I can't even find any significant coverage of that case. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Rashmika Mandanna. RL0919 (talk) 21:10, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Rashmika Mandanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article sets a bad precendent. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Priyamani. Fails CFORK, NLIST this information could very easily be accommodated in the main article, there is no need for a stand alone list, has not been discussed as a group by independent non-promotional reliable sources. No need to delete this article, only merge it back to Rashmika Mandanna. The number of awards and nominations seem dubious here [7], might just be fan work. DareshMohan (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Rashmika Mandanna: Too soon and too short. Kailash29792 (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Awards, Lists, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Mergeinto Rashmika Mandanna: no need for a separate article. PamD 10:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Rashmika_Mandanna#Awards_and_nominations. This do not have to be separate page. RangersRus (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Rashmika Mandanna: Too soon and not much content for a separate page yet. Yupsguts (talk) 10:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Rashmika Mandanna: Per Kailash29792. Charliehdb (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Mergeinto Rashmika Mandanna.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Not so big as of yet. Azuredivay (talk) 17:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bowdon Railway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Georgia (U.S. state). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: A good amount of coverage in books and newspapers. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep While the article is in a sorry state, a quick search on Google books shows plenty of significant coverage, making this easily clear GNG (and most railroads do). I have added a reference and expanded the article slightly, I will likely continue this work in the next few days. There's enough to write a proper article here. Unfortunately there's only one of me and many railroads with sorry-looking articles on Wikipedia. Compare what Waycross Air Line Railroad looks like today with what it looked like before it was brought to my attention: [8]. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I've added some sources and text as well. Mackensen (talk) 01:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of Thai dishes. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phat mi Khorat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Thailand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with List of Thai dishes: Individual recipe does not appear to need a standalone article, Google search does not provide deeper coverage beyond recipe and origin. Reywas92^Talk 04:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge, per Reywas92. I agree with these points fully. Rrjmrrr (talk) 08:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: If not kept, it should be without prejudice to the creation of a properly referenced article, as there are plenty of sources covering the dish's history and cultural aspects.[9][10][11] --Paul_012 (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 21:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid Siddiqui (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated after soft delete. Still no evidence of meeting WP:NPOL * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Still nothing to establish notability. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and India. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Probably have enough for a basic article [12] and [13] are RS. What's used in the article now are primary sources. Oaktree b (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The first one doesn’t really counter towards GNG for me. The second one I can’t assess right now and I don’t know why. The first one just isn’t enough for me to reconsider my !vote. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Those appear to be about a completely different person with the same name. SportingFlyer T·C 19:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:NPOL. The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. RangersRus (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for failing WP:NPOL - the two articles mentioned above are about Shahid Siddiqui and not this person, the entire article is two sentences long, the three sources in the article are not great for notability, and there are two external links making this potentially promotional. SportingFlyer T·C 19:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG and the two articles above about a person quitting the Rashtriya Lok Dal a small party with 2MPs out of 543 are about Shahid Siddiqui and not the subject.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cavalcade station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any reliable sources for this article, even newspapers as well. Fails WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. I don't see how this article can be on this website. To me, this needs to be discussed. GoodHue291 (talk) 16:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I found general mention of this station on travel websites but nothing that would qualify as a source for this article. It seems to violate WP:NRV. Garsh (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I did not realize this was nominated by a sock. I am ok with speedy keeping this @Thryduulf. I’ll do a merger discussion for the set later. Garsh (talk) 06:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The other stations on this line seem to have similar sourcing/depth of content. Is there any particular reason you focused on this station specifically for this AfD? Jumpytoo Talk 21:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep without prejudice to re-nom by a non-sock and per Thryduulf. Jumpytoo Talk 20:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep without prejudice to a merger discussion for all the stations on the line. It makes no sense to treat one member of the set differently to the others, and especially deleting just one will seriously harm the encyclopaedia. Thryduulf (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• While I strongly doubt this is notable, AfD filer is a sock and I'm inclined to say this should be closed. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  As @Garsh has expressed a good-faith recommendation to delete this can't be speedily kept for being a bad-faith nomination. Thryduulf (talk) 08:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• This is an interesting AFD. It's a less of a surprise when there is an AFD for a small station closed for decades or that had infrequent service but this is an active light rail station in the United States with frequent service. That being said, I can find very little information about the station. I can't even find station area plans for this station or others. Looking at the map and the StreetView, it looks little more than a tram stop and there are vacant trash-filled lots across the street. This suggests to me that there likely is very little to know about the station. I would prefer that this AFD get bundled with other Red Line extension stations opened in 2013 which all appear almost identical. -Eóin (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep per Thryduulf, it makes no sense to delete this article and keep other near-identical ones for the other stations on the line. If somebody in good faith feels strongly enough to bring the full set of stations on this line to AfD (or likely more sensibly to propose merging) I'd not necessarily be against that. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Thryduulf. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Hynds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Does not pass WP:BASIC either. Subject never held any NPOL-passable office. Generally fails notability. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Northern Ireland. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete His sole claim to notability appears to be as a local councillor, which fails WP:NPOL. The article has zero secondary sources - all sources are his own website and his social media which is completely unacceptable for a biography. It appears this article was created as promo. AusLondonder (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Autophagy. This is my best guess at a rough consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liz (talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder, please do not move, redirect or merge an article during an AFD discussion, it really complicates the discussion and its closure. I mean, just wait until the discussion is closed, please. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ATG (autophagy acronym) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unsure of the need for a separate article on an acronym which offers nothing more than a few lines of basic non-encyclopedic synthesis. Could be covered in Autophagy instead. X (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete First off, it's not even an acronym. Second, a search for ATG leads to a disambig page that has listings for autophagy and autophagy-related genes and proteins, which seems much more specific than anything this page offers. Third, as the nom said, the article is essentially about the use of the "ATG" shorthand in biology, which isn't anything that can't be mentioned in a half-sentence in the gene or autophagy articles. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  14:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename It is certainly not an acronym, but that was the first thing that popped into my head when I was struggling to create this page. "ATG (abbreviation)" would be better, but I am open to other suggestions. I frequently have found the abbreviation ATG commonly used in autophagy literature meaning "autophagy-related" referring to genes Regulation of autophagy gene expression or to proteins Autophagy and innate immunity or both. I modified the ATG disambiguation page to reflect that fact. The ATG (autophagy acronym) gave the disambiguation page a Wikipedia page to go to for verification and peer-reviewed literature examples, whereas formerly there was none. My modification of the ATG disambiguation page improves the situation, but I think Wikipedia should have a page justifying and giving examples of the abbreviation "ATG-related" which can be confusing in the autophagy scientific literature, especially when it is not explained in an encyclopedic source. --Ben Best:Talk 23:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have linked this article to a Wikipedia page using ATG to mean autophagy-related and was planning to look for other Wikipedia pages using ATG with this meaning.--Ben Best:Talk 06:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have created the page ATG (abbreviation) and marked the page ATG (autophagy acronym) for speedy deletion. --Ben Best:Talk 16:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Autophagy. Anything that's autophagy-related is probably already mentioned in its article, so the content in this article should be moved to a new section of the autophagy article to clarify how the names of genes and proteins are related to it. Afterwards, this page should be kept as a redirect. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 16:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Just noticed how the Molecular biology section of the article mentions it in its first paragraph; the content can be merged there. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 17:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'd like to let everyone know that I've blanked and redirected ATG (autophagy acronym) after the author requested for the page to be deleted and I moved the AfD discussion as well; the link at the top of this AfD now links to ATG (abbreviation), which has the same content as the original page. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 17:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Autophagy#Molecular biology as the best location to host this information. The page has excellent, relatively recent reviews not currently found at Autophagy, and they should be kept (even if they're only currently being under-used to explain an abbreviation). Would ATG (autophagy acronym) need a history merge with ATG (abbreviation)? ― Synpath 19:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge suggestion adopted I have "Merge into Autophagy#Molecular biology" as suggested, and marked the ATG (autophagy acronym) page for speedy deletion. --Ben Best:Talk 10:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Justlettersandnumbers has deleted my speedy deletion request for the ATG (autophagy acronym) page suggesting that the debate should still continue. I am waiting for the result. --Ben Best:Talk 00:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Histmerge ATG (autophagy acronym) into ATG (abbreviation) and then:

• Redirect that page to ATG. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I've created an adjective part-of-speech entry at wikt:ATG which includes the meaning and one of the citations from the wikipedia article. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. SK1, sources being old is not a recognised reason for deletion under the Wikipedia: Deletion policy. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 16:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Front for the Liberation of the Golan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primaraly lack of recent sources (be they primary or secondary), the information we do currently have is "outdated" news articles, no official (be it from MID, Syria itself or any other official source) reports on "leadership, financing, members, published documents, etc." Ukudoks (talk) 13:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Organizations, and Syria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Organizations, Iran, Israel, and Syria. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  14:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Demoscene#List of demoparties. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nullarbor (demoparty) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources (including by searching in Trove). Also, the Nullarbor website had a section for media coverage; many of the sources listed there either aren't reliable, don't provide significant coverage, or aren't independent (media/press releases). A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties. toweli (talk) 12:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Video games, Visual arts, Events, Computing, and Australia. toweli (talk) 12:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties as an WP:AtD. --Mika1h (talk) 13:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is actually the 2nd AfD, the previous one was in 2007: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nullarbor (demo party). --Mika1h (talk) 13:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 14:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Academic dress of universities in Queensland, Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While certainly interesting, not encyclopaedic and not notable. WP:NOTDATABASE 5225_C (talk • contributions) 12:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Australia. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 12:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Australia. Owen× ☎ 12:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTGUIDE. Of zero interest and encyclopaedic value outside the universities. LibStar (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Are my eyes playing tricks on me or is there only one reference cited, a website where one can buy academic robes? The content of this page intuitively strikes me as good, but functionally zero sources? I see this article is twelve years old. Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Nayib Bukele#Presidency. To be clear, Dclemens1971's comments and research have established the notability of this topic. However, there is consensus in the discussion below that there is no need for a standalone article for what can be concisely covered at Nayib Bukele#Presidency. Malinaccier (talk) 02:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The maintenance tag claiming sources exist. However, most of the sources are not about the inauguration but the current affairs of nation that is covered in 2024_Salvadoran_general_election#Presidency_of_Nayib_Bukele and Nayib_Bukele#Presidency, i.e. [14]. There is nothing much at least in the English sources about the preparation of the event, what transpired during the event, and any post event celebrations, with exception of a bombing plot, and a protest in Chicago, both of which can be easily tucked into 2024_Salvadoran_general_election#Aftermath. – robertsky (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Politics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy redirect/merge to Nayib_Bukele#Presidency. Don't make articles just for the sake of making articles. Inaugurations do not automatically need a standalone page. Reywas92^Talk 17:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  This is an acceptable outcome in lieu of an outright deletion. – robertsky (talk) 04:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I haven't even delved into the Spanish sources but there is lots of WP:RS WP:SIGCOV in English alone, including of the event itself (Deutsche Presse-Agentur, AP, Al Jazeera), guests (MercoPress, Politico, Deseret News, Xinhua), international reactions (AP), plus the bomb plot (AP, Reuters) mentioned by the nominator. I'm sure there's even more in Spanish. Now that the event has happened, there's plenty of coverage to support a standalone page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  On the sources you have raised here:

  • Deutsche Presse-Agentur, AP, Al Jazeera these are some of what I referred to when I wrote most of the sources are not about the inauguration but the current affairs of nation. If it is about the event itself, I would expect significant coverage about the event itself and not a majority of the content of each source about the state of affairs in the country, his management style, and the challenges ahead for him or the country.
  • Guest list is the least of consideration for notability of the event. Notability is not inherited, nor this page should be a guest list as well, which some had tried to turn this page into (see WP:NOTDIR and also WP:INDISCRIMINATE). Nothing in the sources here (MercoPress, Politico, Deseret News, Xinhua) is of anything significant about the event except that 'X had attended".
  • (AP) that is an reaction to the president's management in his term (in my opinion, might be worthy of a split from his main article if extended further).
  • bomb plot. further details than what has been provided currently is required. otherwise by itself, it is a news report.

  – robertsky (talk) 00:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Like any good news source, the coverage will situate the event in its context. In fact, under WP:NEVENTS, such sources should be "in-depth coverage [that] includes analysis that puts events into context." Each article I cited devotes several paragraphs (up to half the article) specifically to inaugural events and the rest to the context. As for guests, inauguration pages on WP almost universally cover international guest attendance. See (as just a few examples) Inauguration of Lai Ching-te, Second inauguration of Goodluck Jonathan, Inauguration of Bernardo Arévalo, and so forth. (And every source I provided is WP:RS for this kind of news and provides significant coverage of the attendance and the dynamics around it.) Finally, the alleged bomb plot was part of the preparations for the inauguration and belongs in such an article. Unless you're trying to say that presidential inaugurations are inherently non-notable topics, in which case you need to propose an SNG, it's clear that this subject clears the tests imposed by WP:GNG and WP:NEVENTS. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  There is no need for a separate SNG. The entire WP:NEVENTS has to be taken into consideration, not just the coverage of the event. Coverage is a given, after all it is a planned event directly after the election:

  Points to consider:

  1. Is there a lasting effect from the inauguration as an event? None so far.
  2. Is there a significant impact of the inauguration as an event? None so far.
  3. What's the depth of the coverage of the event? Surface level. What was the planning? What happened during the inauguration? Who/What agencies were involved in the planned? Why was there a change in the venue? What was said during the inauguration. As argued before, the analysis is already written for in the general elections page, and the inauguration is the result of the general election. There is no need for a separate article as such.
  4. What's the duration of the coverage? Immediate after the event, no further news coverage that I can find in the 7 days since the inauguration.
  5. What's the diversity of sources? Diverse but same set of talking points.
  6. And with respect to inauguration as a planned event. Is the coverage a routine coverage? Yes. One would expect major news outlets to cover a planned national level event as part of their routine news cycle.

  As for the other inauguration pages, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. But if I may, these pages are likely going to be evaluated in the same manner for AfD. – robertsky (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Consider:

  1/2. Is there a lasting effect/significant impact from the inauguration? Bukele remains president, so yes. The swearing-in is required under the constitution and thus it has an ongoing effect. The election is the predicate for this event, but it is not identical to the inauguration and it has no effect if the inauguration does not take place according to constitutional procedure. (This is

  3. See below in my comments on the Spanish language sources, but the depth of coverage is sufficient to meet this test.

  4/5. We are 10 days out from the event, which NEVENTS makes clear is not too soon for an event to become notable. But the event has been covered beyond the initial day or two of news, and it has been covered in a variety of sources in both English and Spanish, with both straight news and opinion coverage. NPR discusses the inauguration's influence on the Biden administration's immigration policy. LoveFM provides skeptical coverage of Belizean participation in the inauguration. Semafor covered the inauguration in light of Claudia Sheinbaum's election in Mexico.

  6. It definitely goes beyond routine coverage with substantial detailed mentions in the U.S. political press as well as the press in Spain. It's not just wire services and Salvadoran press covering this.

  (P.S. Please read carefully: I didn't cite the other inauguration pages as an OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument for notability of this subject. I cited them to point out that these types of pages generally cover international guests, which demonstrates a longstanding consensus that guests are a significant aspect of inaugurations. Thus, WP:RS coverage of inauguration guests contributes to the notability of the subject matter.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: How much has the article really changed since its previous iteration? I still do think this was recreated by a certain LTA block evading, though I can't say for certain. jellyfish ✉ 04:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The infobox remained the same; all sections you see now were there as well, unfilled; the international guests section was unfilled (naturally, since it was before the event).

  This is the lead in the last deleted revision for evaluation:

  The Second inauguration of Nayib Bukele as president of El Salvador will take place on Saturday, 1 June 2024, in the El Salvador Chamber of Deputies in San Salvador. The inauguration will mark the commencement of the four-year term of Bukele as president and Félix Ulloa as vice president. The inauguration will mark the formal culmination of Bukele's presidential transition that began after he won the 2024 Salvadoran presidential election held on 4 February 2024. – robertsky (talk) 04:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I've provided numerous English-language secondary and reliable sources upthread that provide significant coverage of this event. Further search finds numerous Spanish-language sources as well: Stories in La Prensa Grafica interviewing a historian on symbolism in the ceremony, on the economic and social aspects of Bukele's inaugural address, on international reactions to the inauguration, critiquing Catholic Church participation in the ceremony, and protests by Salvadoran expats at several embassies around the world, plus detailed coverage in Spain's El Pais: [15], [16]. Despite the nominator's determination to reject every source presented thus far, at this point we have an abundance of multiple language/country/types of sources to validate the notability of this topic and I'm going to leave the discussion to other editors to review. Dclemens1971 (talk) 08:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  So maybe write an article with them then? We do not need a standalone article that says nothing except that he was inaugurated (WP:NOPAGE). Even if there are sources toward notability, all of these can certainly be included in in Nayib_Bukele#Presidency or 2024_Salvadoran_general_election#Aftermath, and then WP:SPLIT when appropriate and warranted. Presidency of Nayib Bukele would also be an appropriate split, which would include info about inaugurations. Reywas92^Talk 14:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Frankly I don't have time to write that article, but WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP so if the sources support notability, we keep. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  So we're not deleting, we're merging this measley three sentences while remaining open to a split if/when there is more content. "if the sources support notability, we keep" is downright false because you could use sources to establish notability on many, many things Bukele or other politicians do, but we have WP:NOPAGE and editorial discretion to cover notable topics within the context of other topics. Here, we can cover this topic with these sources in the context of these closely related articles, and we don't need a separate article just to list a few attendees. There a lot of heads of state around the world now and in history, all of whose inaugurations were covered in the media, but very simply we do not inherently need separate pages for these concepts just because sources exist. Reywas92^Talk 21:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  No one has created pages for other inaugurations yet, so we're not having arguments about those pages (WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST). Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect or delete per other's reasoning, and partly on WP:BANREVERT. It is a nice honeypot for the sock. No prejudice to recreation if someone wants to actually create a real article as the event is notable. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect or delete per Classicwiki. Almost entirely written by socks and obvious anon socks. Wikishovel (talk) 05:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Hernández (footballer, born 1992) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially fails WP:GNG here. I found him on Transfermarkt and Soccerway but these don't count towards notability. I found some brief mentions in La Brecha, Pasión Rojiblanca and ESPN but none of this can be considered significant coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Mexico. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Using the keyword "Luis Hernández", Google searches find other men with the same name instead of this footballer, failing WP:V too. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. JTtheOG (talk) 19:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) CMD (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malek Rahmati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I first saw this article when I was searching about the 2024 Varzaqan helicopter crash. I prefer the information of this article in other websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 (talk • contribs) 11:34 8 June 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per our guidelines on notability of politicians, province-wide officeholders are notable. Moreover, there is adequate RS coverage of the subject. Davey2116 (talk) 17:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Merge. Why not merge his article into the article containing the list of current Iran governors-general? That would be a better aternative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep He was the governor-general of a province; that alone combined with coverage in sources makes him notable. Also what does I prefer the information of this article in other websites even mean? We don't get articles deleted because of our personal preferences. Keivan.f^Talk 18:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  What I meant when I said I prefer the information of this article in other websites, I meant by either websites outside Wikipedia or the Persian language Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  So this basically means that the article can be further improved since another edition of Wikipedia has an even more detailed article on him. Again, this is no ground for deletion. Keivan.f^Talk 22:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Then I prefer this article in the Persian language Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The OP's nomination rationale doesn't make sense. There are plenty of sources in the article to demonstrate notability. Toughpigs (talk) 17:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep: Applications of WP:SKCRIT#1 and #3. The nominator has failed to provide an accurate deletion rationale and has also failed to give intelligible grounds for content deletion. And regarding the article itself, the article can still be improved. The article meets guidelines on the notability of politicians. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Speedy Move: Like I said, I prefer this article in the Persian language Wikipedia. Anonymy365248 (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Having preferences are not ground to change the status of an article whether to delete, keep, merge or redirect. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isochem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company is a wholly owned subsidiary PMC Group International which does not have a wiki page or non-primary articles on it by reliable publications. of https://www.chemanager-online.com/en/news/pmc-buys-isochems-pharma-business Mixmon (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and France. Owen× ☎ 12:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No valid reason to delete. You have not proved that Isochem itself fails GNG. –<bUser:LaundryPizza03|LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep (but improve): Some news about this company could be found, mostly dealing with its buyout by PMC: [17], [18]. That might be just barely enough to meet WP:NCORP. I don't read/speak French, so someone who is able to parse French sources might be able to vet sources better than me. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep keep the article as per User:WeirdNAnnoyed and User:LaundryPizza03

MICHAEL 942006 (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Article needs work but should not be deleted. Shafi ahmed.0 (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yael Pineda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A really poorly sourced article on a BLP about a footballer that briefly played in the 2nd tier of Mexico. The best that I could find was Futbol Sapiens, which is not enough to show a WP:GNG pass. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Mexico. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. JTtheOG (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 10:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Cameron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. None of the political positions occupied by this subject is NPOL-passable. Also fails GNG or BASIC generally. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, and Australia. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping to add some more info in a couple hours but won't be able to so I won't contest the deletion. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 11:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely should be able to make improvements. This nomination doesn’t stop you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I looked for her and found many people with this name... I put Tasmania in the search box and found very little about her: fails WP:GNG. Also, Deputy-mayors and councillors of themselves are not considered notable according to WP:politician. They need significant press coverage for that— Iadmc♫^talk  12:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NPOL. LibStar (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of traffic collisions (2000–present)#2017. ^Complex/_Rational 13:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Nueva Ecija bus accident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (events). No evidence of lasting effects based on GNews Archives and GBooks search. A brief and cited mention is already at List_of_traffic_collisions_(2000–present)#2017 so a redirect ther can be an alternative to deletion. Lenticel ^(talk) 09:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Philippines. Lenticel ^(talk) 09:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and merge nothing notable about this particular crash or any WP:LASTING effect. Its supposed claim to notability seems to be one of the deadliest accident within the year (2017). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hariboneagle927 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hariboneagle927, you might want to specify whether you want to delete or merge, merging assumes that a redirect will be made to preserve the page history. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it is.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of traffic collisions (2000–present). Wikipedia is not a collection of news stories. If there are any critical details missing at the target, they can be added there. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of traffic collisions (2000–present). Fails WP:LASTING. SBKSPP (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zero-install (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been undeleted following soft deletion from the previous AfD. Despite that, I still think that this fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:NSOFT, as searching for "zero install" (with quotes) on Google returned no reliable independent secondary sources. GTrang (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. I have changed the article so it now describes a concept, not the particular bit of software, and therefore think that the WP:GNG is more applicable. Some of the old information (about some product) is kept as a section. I am not attached to this text, so if it helps to keep the article, the whole section "Zero Install" (note the uppercase letters) can go. A decent amount of OK sources can be found if the same search is performed on Google Scholar. The problem is that most of these sources do not provide much coverage. The only coherent source found by me that has WP:SIGCOV is a bachelor's thesis, and thus somewhat weak from the reputability perspective. --Викидим (talk) 04:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep since it is not a product, but a kind of process the essays are not relevant. I think more time is required to allow improvement. I remember this concept from over a decade ago, so it is not a new-fangled idea. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Yet another option to consider is to merge the lead into Installation (computer programs)#Necessity (renaming the destination section accordingly). The destination section currently has no sources. --Викидим (talk) 05:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article has become some kind of Frankenstein combination page that disambiguates between several usages of the term zero-install, even though the article was originally about a specific piece of software. I would rather have this article deleted and then a new article created about zero-install created, if the general concept is even notable in the first place. Notability doesn't stack -- using the term in two different contexts to establish notability is very confusing. HyperAccelerated (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The only sources related to a concept itself are: a B. S. WP:SCHOLARSHIP thesis (it's not even masters!) only cited by a patent and the software; and a WP:RESEARCHGATE paper that does not appear to be in any peer-reviewed journal or have significant citations. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• As a term, I don't think it currently meets WP:NEO though it might meet Wiktionary's inclusion criteria... I'm not actually sure, I don't really edit there. Depends on if there's a third use and the two currently cited count as "durably archived" I guess, which seems plausible enough. Delete. (actually, now that I think about it a bit more, it might get deleted on wikt: as a sum of parts) Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 08:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Even rewritten as a concept, I am not convinced it meets our general notability guidelines. I do see mentions on Scholar, but these mentions are passing and pretty sparse. Malinaccier (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Ho King (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly unlikely to pass the WP:10YEARTEST (and WP:SUSTAINED). Content which isn't related to the song isn't substantial enough to merit a stand-alone article. – Hilst [talk] 15:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Music, and Companies. – Hilst [talk] 15:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it not only got popular because of the feud but it has been in business since 1976. So it will continue to be in the news and magazines (especially local ones like Now) as it has been for the last several decades Freedun (yippity yap) 18:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  it will get coverage because it is a very popular restaurant in toronto regardless of the feud Freedun (yippity yap) 18:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, took a spin through the hits, and before the feud there’s not enough coverage for an article, just lists, listicles, coverage of nearby crime, and one art collective that named itself after the restaurant, everyday restaurant coverage stuff, not anything that would give the restuarant lasting notability. Ruth Bader Yinzburg (Ruth Bader Yinzburg)

• Here are some news articles from a long while before the feud. [19] [20] Freedun (yippity yap) 02:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud. The Midnite Wolf (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud or delete. There is no SIGCOV outside the feud and a shooting that occurred in proximity of the restaurant, therefore not enough to pass GNG independently. --hroest 17:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
  1. Sources published before the Kendrick Lamar song "Euphoria" was released on 30 April 2024:
     1. Shikatani, Gerry (1999-12-18). "Cuisine's familiar as an old friend". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13 – via Newspapers.com.

        The review notes: "We do that now at the New Ho King, owned by Howard Wong (and his nephew Albert Wong) who once worked in his father's Rose Garden Cafe in Moose Jaw, Sask., a city where, in fact, writer Fred Wah's grandfather also cooked. The New Ho King's menu covers cooking from various regions of China, but more than anything, customers know it's grounded in Cantonese cuisine as familiar as an old friend. We remember the original Ho King on Dundas St. at Larch St., a tiny block east of Spadina Ave. There we'd pick at periwinkles in black bean sauce at 3 a.m. But 10 years ago, it closed its doors. Then in 1996, there was news. It had resurfaced on Spadina Ave. under new owners, but with their friend, original chef/owner Tom Quan, at the wok."

        The review notes: "It is quite simple, not high-end dramatic. But servings are large, and few Cantonese kitchens are cooking with such accomplishment and light touch, while leaving an equally light trace on the wallet."

     2. Kaplan, Ben (2008-01-12). "New Ho King Restaurant" (pages 1 and 2). National Post. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13 – via Newspapers.com.

        The review notes: "Our Chinese food restaurants should be open for delivery after the bars close, and this inexpensive Spadina Avenue Cantonese greasy spoon is as good as we've tasted any hour of the day. The pork chow mein ($6.95) is crunchy and the stir-fried noodle is wet, dripping with a tangy black bean sauce chock full of beef and bean sprouts Perhaps the General Tso chicken ($8.50) left something to be desired; a harder fried outer coating might have provided a sharper contrast with the white chicken meat, but this restaurant is a revelation—the only way to improve it would be to include a 3:05 a.m. helping of cold tea with its lightning-fast delivery."

     3. Chow, Jason (2008-02-02). "The Dawdling Dragon". National Post. Archived from the original on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13 – via Newspapers.com.

        The review notes: "1. New Ho King. 416 Spadina Ave. Everybody knows this late-night spot feeds the drunks till 5 a.m. (see our cold tea story on Page 13), but few know that you actually don't have to endure a room filled with club-land loudmouths to get your fix of chow mein. The better alternative: Go home and call for delivery. You can get your fried rice in the comfort of your living room as late as 3 a.m. on weekdays and even later on weekends."

     4. Quadri, Sarah (2003). "New Ho King". In Clark, Alexandra (ed.). Cheapeats Toronto: Toronto's Guide to Good Inexpensive Restaurants. Plethora Press: Toronto. p. 83. ISBN 0-9731201-1-8. Retrieved 2024-06-13 – via Internet Archive.

        The book notes: "Even on a Sunday night you could be lined up outside the door for this place. New Ho attracts all ages until the wee hours of the morning. There's an unbelievable selection of Chinese and Cantonese dishes, all served very fresh at reasonable prices. Don't forget to try the hot & sour soup ($5) - excellent and they don't skimp on the shrimp. Other favs include the General Tso chicken ($7.95) and the eggplant and shrimp with garlic sauce ($8.50). A worthwhile stop in downtown Chinatown."

     5. Davey, Steven (2011-06-20). "New New Ho King". Now. Archived from the original on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13.

        The article notes: "It might not be the most cutting-edge Cantonese kitchen on the Avenue but New Ho King is certainly one of the most popular as the lengthy lineups after last call will attest. To handle the crowds, NHK has moved into much larger and far swankier split-level digs three doors away. ... The food’s the same as it ever was, a little bit too salty and verging on over-cooked. Like that matters at 3 am?"

  2. Sources published after the Kendrick Lamar song "Euphoria" was released on 30 April 2024:
     1. Brown, T.M. (2024-05-06). "A Chinese Restaurant Is Winning the Kendrick Lamar-Drake Beef. New Ho King, open since 1976 in Toronto, has become an unlikely pop-culture battleground after being featured in songs from both rappers". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2024-05-27. Retrieved 2024-06-13.

        The article notes: "Caught in the middle of this culture-consuming rivalry is New Ho King, an unassuming restaurant in Toronto’s Chinatown. The restaurant, which has served dishes like hot-pot grouper and tofu, and sweet-and-sour pork with pineapple to Torontonians for nearly 50 years, was briefly name-checked in “Euphoria.”"

     2. Cecco, Leyland (2024-05-10). "'There's been one winner – this restaurant': Toronto eatery is victor in Kendrick-Drake beef. Hip-hop luminaries bash each other in a diss track war of war of words featuring an unlikely venue: the New Ho King restaurant". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13.

        The article notes: "New Ho King, which has operated in the city’s Chinatown for nearly five decades, is still grappling with the newfound fame. Until recently, its tables would be sparsely populated on weekday evenings, picking up pace on the weekends as late-night crowds wandered in. But on a Thursday evening, a line snaked out the door as diners clamoured for a table. Passersby stopped outside the pink glow of the restaurant’s neon sign and posed for photos. ... Neither Lamar nor Drake specify which rice dish diners should order from the 14 menu options: the most popular is the Ho King Special Fried Rice, a mix of shrimp, pork, eggs, peas and lettuce."

     3. Assaly, Richie (2024-05-02). "Drake vs Kendrick: Toronto Chinese restaurant New Ho King takes centre stage in escalating rap beef". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13.

        The article notes: "At 410 Spadina Ave., in the heart of Toronto’s historic Chinatown, New Ho King is a go-to spot for authentic Chinese food and late-night eats."

     4. Liu, Karon (2024-05-06). "We ate at Toronto's New Ho King, the spot Kendrick Lamar name-dropped. Here's what to order". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-13.

        The article lists five dishes.

  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow New Ho King (Chinese: 新豪京) to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk) 09:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Cunard (talk) 09:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sufficient coverage in RS demonstrated above. AryKun (talk) 08:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the sources provided by Cunard show sufficient reliable sustained interest in the subject. We can always revisit if the standards change. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Following the research by Cunard, it appears that the subject satisfies the general notability guidelines. I think the sources independent of the Lamar-Drake feud have answered the nominator's concerns that this is a passing moment. Malinaccier (talk) 02:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 10:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Dickov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced women's footballer. The two independent sources in the article are a trivial mention and an interview with minimal routine coverage. I can't find any WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Scotland. JTtheOG (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I believe that she is related to Paul Dickov but I can't find anything other than social media sites to confirm this so it's probably not worth preserving this even as a redirect. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Let'srun (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Star Hill Ponies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, United Kingdom, and Wales. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I found a newspaper article called "Trotting towards stardom" in the South Wales Evening Post, April 1999, and one called "Titanic tricks for TV puppets" in the Western Daily Press, April 1999. Toughpigs (talk) 17:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, given what was presented here and on the page (thanks Toughpigs) or at the very least Redirect to Bumper Films, if the said sources are really found insufficient. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw, based on citations noted by Toughpigs. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Malinaccier (talk) 02:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WTAM-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; some references are outdated. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Florida. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.: A history (which, despite what the article implies, actually goes back to the early 1990s, albeit with the license history being severed via a digital companion channel) of mostly national services isn't the path to significant coverage, even before HC2/Innovate took over. There may well be something out there (as best I can tell this is actually this article's first deletion nomination — it wasn't part of that bulk nomination of many other HC2/Innovate station articles), but as currently written this is another remnant of the far looser inclusion standards of 2006. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• There is a second St. Pete Times article on WTAM ([21] + [22]). The station history appears to run like this. Owners in the 90s included Carol E. Schatz and Equity Broadcasting Corporation's Kaleidoscope channel (it was W06BE on channel 6 before becoming WTAM). It was sold to US Interactive LLC, which wanted to (and probably did) use the station in wireless internet testing. It gets sold to Lotus (both of these are similar to KPHE-LD Phoenix) and goes Spanish, though attempt number one fails. I just wish we had more to go on. A third solid reference in local media would have me keeping this, but a redirect might suffice. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Demoscene#List of demoparties. Based on minimal participation, the article can be recreated, see WP:SOFTDELETE. Malinaccier (talk) 02:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very Important Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties. toweli (talk) 08:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts, Events, Computing, and France. toweli (talk) 08:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Demoscene#List of demoparties. — Maile (talk) 13:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Gul Panag. Based on minimal participation, the article can be recreated, see WP:SOFTDELETE. Malinaccier (talk) 02:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off Road with Gul Panag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 14:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Gul Panag: as ATD. A line can be added there with a source. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Malinaccier (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Satja Nai Chum Joan (Suea Sung Fah III) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 14:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Thailand. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Looking up สัจจะในชุมโจร turns up lots of coverage (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL), though as is usual for entertainment news, a lot of it is based on supplied PR material. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• First part has a page, 2nd part too, so, coverage allowing verification, I'm in favour of Keeping this as a short (detailed) article. If the identified coverage is judged insufficiently independent, Redirect to Suea Sung Fah. Opposed to deletion.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sokpoly Voeun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized article about a filmmaker and photographer, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers or photographers. The strongest attempted notability claim here is a table of "nominations" for awards at various film festivals, except there aren't actually real awards in the mix here: three of the listed festivals are just "screened" or "selected", with no evidence of any actual award nominations or wins shown at all, and most of them are "to be announced" because the festival is still in the future and hasn't even released its program announcements yet, so it still isn't even confirmed that the film will even screen there at all, let alone win any awards.
All of them, further, are "sourced" to the self-published websites of the film festivals themselves, rather than media coverage, and the rest of the footnotes are also a mix of primary and unreliable sources that aren't support for notability, rather than WP:GNG-building coverage in media or books.
There's also a possible conflict of interest here, as the creator and primary other editor have been blocked as sockpuppets in an WP:SPI check following their behaviour in the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reign in Slumber discussion. Bearcat (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Photography, and Cambodia. Bearcat (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Still no reliable sources found in my searches, same as in 2022 when this last came up in AfD. Sourcing now used for the article is all red/orange per Cite Highlighter, so none are reliable. Daily Motion, ImdB and others. Oaktree b (talk) 00:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: ZERO hits on Cambodian websites using a .kh search [23]. There just isn't coverage about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 00:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it with fire: Zero evidence of notability added since the last AfD. None of the sources provide suitable evidence of notability. No BEFORE results that would pass either. Most of the film festival references fail verification entirely. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  P.S. I suppose it would be notable if reliable sources verified that he is 531 feet tall as it says in the infobox :) Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.