The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - TP 01:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Kwang-sik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Formerly PRODded as "Unintelligible machine translation": PROD removed with no explanation, no appreciable improvement to quality of text. PamD 18:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The wiki editing method and prospect of subsequent improvement are no excuse for writing articles so abysmal as to be of no value whatsoever. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unsalvagable. We do the readers of Wikipedia no favours with an article so bad as to need to be competely rewritten to be intelligible. -- Whpq (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the whole article is machine translated. Hvn0413 (talk) 10:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.