The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –MuZemike 19:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth C. Bucchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author. Ridernyc (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• very weak keep In view of the material here [1], particular the one in the Washington Posrt, [2] he might well be notable for his claims to have worked for the CIA: There seems to be significant coverage besides the CNN stories referred to in the article there. It's not one event, for his principal book Operation Pseudo Miranda is in 280 worldcat libraries, and was reviewed briefly in Booklist v. 97 no. 9/10 (Jan. 1-15 2001) & Library Journal (1976) v. 126 no. 4 (Mar. 1 2001). One of the reviewers recognized the content was dubious, one didn't. . DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Yes, he has a book out, but the WP:RS given for it are in the business of reviewing just about every title that is published, so they do not satisfy WP:BK. Hard to see how he would otherwise satisfy WP:AUTHOR. Qworty (talk) 20:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per DGG's good research. His contested claim that he was a CIA agent is itself barely notable, based on the possible sources. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.