The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. decltype (talk) 09:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James Ennes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP; no sources have materialized in the two years since this article was tagged as such. Stonemason89 (talk) 16:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: the Liberty had hundreds of surviving crew, what makes this individual more notable than the rest? Fails WP:MILPEOPLE. bahamut0013^words_deeds 11:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Subject has written a book about this notable incident. The fact that none of the possible references from GBooks, GNews, and GScholar have been added to the article is grounds for improvement, not deletion. Edward321 (talk) 16:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Internet searches indicate that the subject of this articles does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines.--PinkBull 02:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.