The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 06:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grant L. Spackman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is someone with a Distinguished Flying Cross inerently WP:NOTABLE? Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No, someone with the DFC or any other third-level decoration is not inherently notable. Doesn't seem to be any other reason for him to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not notable. GregJackP Boomer! 18:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.