The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:12, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Kirschner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains^(talk) 01:00, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Subject clearly does meet general notability guidelines. Sakaimover (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC) — Sakaimover (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Architect 134 (talk • contribs). [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 03:36, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Forgive me for my delayed reply and for not being as versed as I should be in the publication and discussion process. I appreciate the oversight of biographical pages to protect the integrity of the site. I would strongly contend that Glenn Kirschner is more than distinguished enough to have a biographical page as a regular fixture on national news media providing legal insight into current events. In addition, he has had a notable legal career for which he is being portrayed in a major motion picture that will be released next year. I am hopeful that those contributing to this discussion will see the great merits in keeping Glenn Kirschner's page. Thank you for your time and attention. EjwiiEjwii (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe a little WP:TOOSOON. I do see him cited, mentioned in a number of news articles, but none I scanned flagged him as having apivotal role in anything significant. He is an attorney, and a talking head. But, no profiles, no INDEPTH that I can find. Feel free to ping me to reconsider if you find something substantive.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per E.M.Gregory. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.