The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States). SoWhy 18:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Luz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

George Luz was an NCO with E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States) during World War II. Neither his rank (Technician Fourth Grade) nor his highest award (Bronze Star) make him notable under WP:SOLDIER. After the war, Luz led a quiet, non-notable life. Post-war writings about him are largely anecdotal. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 18:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 19:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 19:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 19:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 20:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No tags for this post.