The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep b/c no accurate deletion rationale was provided. As an added note, the improvement and notability tags were added 6 minutes after the creation of the article, then the article was nominated for AfD 5 minutes after that. This didn't allow sufficient time for the article to be improved or even finish the creation process. In addition, a quick search on Google Scholar shows the subject likely meets Wikipedia notability guidelines‎. SouthernNights (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Purbeck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subjects do not meet criteria for the general notability guideline while not passing WP:NAUTHOR either. The entire article is about the two subjects' works, none of which have articles, and the article clearly states that little is known about the authors at all. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Of course I may be biased as I drafted the article and first posted it not five minutes ago. The Purbeck sisters are included in several well-established reference works on women's writing, as noted in the references, which indicates sufficient notability to my mind: They have entries in the following:

They are also referred to in at least one piece of scholarship on another author:

scribblingwoman 16:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No tags for this post.