The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Wood (environmental campaigner) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear that this individual meets notability requirements. Claim of notability includes leadership of a non-notable organization. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 20:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nomination relies on the organization Computer TakeBack Campaign not being a notable organization, therefore see that article and my argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer TakeBack Campaign, same nominator. Anarchangel (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A single publicity stunt doesn't create notability.—Kww(talk) 12:48, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Jake Wartenberg 02:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Subject of article was an important leader of *two* notable organizations: the GrassRoots Recycling Network (GRRN) and the Computer TakeBack Campaign (CTBC). Both organizations were cutting-edge, predicting the tsunami of electronic waste now washing over the globe. David Wood made indelible contributions to both. The problems he was a pioneer in addressing are far from resolved, but he played a key role in bringing them to the attention of the general public, the media, and policymakers.DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The related AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer TakeBack Campaign was not transcluded onto the log for the 15 of August and has been opened since then without any relists. I have relisted that debate onto the log for the 5th so it may be open for another 7 days. I'm bringing this up because the notability of the subject of this debate may be dependent on the result of that AFD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.