The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3 - obvious hoax. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boary Mount (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic without any references, Google and Google Scholar turned up zero results. Does not appear notable and frankly I am not sure if this is even a real place or term. Mrfrobinson (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• speedily delete as patent hoax. One of the author's only other two edits was linking to this article as part of this vandalism. I would also add the that the article is complete bollocks. Mangoe (talk) 14:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to speedily delete it as no context but was shot down...Mrfrobinson (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.