The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Udgir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One source, for a "battle" with fewer men than a pub brawl, really? Slatersteven (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Slatersteven (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, India, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete passing mention is a single ref. More Indian battlebollox. Mccapra (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as it finds mention in various online English sources. Also being called as apogee of Maratha empire. (Source added in article). §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• PLease read wp:n. Slatersteven (talk) 11:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What part of it? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Third Battle of Panipat#Prelude -- As a standalone article, this fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT on just about every criterion. There is no lasting WP:EFFECT here and not nearly enough detail on the event to make an encyclopaedic article. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 13:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how are they related apart from the fact that one party was common. Panipat battle was with Durranis some 1600 kms away from Udgir where Marathas fought Hyderabadi Nizam. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Merge is unsuitable as this article is not reliably sourced. -- asilvering (talk) 23:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which source used in the article is unreliable? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No cosensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I do not find a complete detail or even a paragraph heavily describing the battle and most of the sources are unreliable. There is no noteworthy notability for a justification to have an article of its own.RangersRus (talk) 23:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails GNG and NEVENT per above. Not every individual fight mentioned somewhere in a book needs its own article. I'd be open to trimming and merging if someone can show proper sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk  07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.