- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Avinash-class submarine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article lacks reliable sources verify the claims and only depend on a forum post and has close resembles previously AFD deleted Arihant follow-on submarine after this discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arihant follow-on submarine Nicky mathew (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti Talk 15:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti Talk 15:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - only a few speculations about this class of submarine (The codename of this project is SSBN S-5 per this source) exits. I couldn't find a reference in reliable source(s) about the project being named Avinash-class. I think this can wait for better sources to be available. Delete per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arihant follow-on submarine—UY Scuti Talk 16:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 00:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 00:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
You must be logged in to post a comment.