The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moved to Draft space. (non-admin closure) Vulcan's Forge (talk) 03:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ariade Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOLDIER. She was the only woman serving in an Army, but this does not meet WP:NSOLDIER. WP:BEFORE in Google, Baidu, and JSTOR did not reveal additional sources except [1] which does not contribute to meeting notability.   // Timothy :: talk  02:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  02:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  02:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  02:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doesn't meet GNG WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 10:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The only woman serving in a major army is clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• No RS that that is even true. Mztourist (talk) 12:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If something is a truly notable accomplishment we would have sources on it. Wikipedia follows sources. 3rd party reliable sources determine what is notable by covering it, we do not determine what is notable by fiat. "only x doing y" is not a default sign of notability lacking sources that support the claim that only x doing y, or first x to do y, is a notable thing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.