User talk:Rudilouis

Welcome!

Hello, Rudilouis! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 11:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: AFL Era Statistics (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:
Article needs more references for verification, statistics about Australian football league should be a subtopic under AFL if there are no other references available
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tesleemah (talk) 12:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rudilouis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tesleemah (talk) 12:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AFL Era Statistics (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please give a introduction about these tallies. Citations are usually not on the subtitle, instead, they are at the end of each sentences.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-Lemonaka 07:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AFL Era Statistics (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Australian Football League. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is neutral in tone, references are okay, but is not substantial enough to have a full article on its own (at least not yet). I think it would be better suited for the content of this draft to be part of the Australian Football League article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NeoGaze (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NeoGaze
Thanks for your feedback! I have looked extensively at the AFL wiki and I can't find a place for it to fit. It's an emerging (and somewhat contentious) agenda, but has seen a significant increase in favour in younger fans of the sport, given its intrinsically novel and inclusive nature. The purpose for this particular article is that it would be contributed to and developed over time - from people with greater access and resources than I. The VFL exists as a completely separate historical competition when considering the additions of teams from other states and leagues, each with their own history. There is an inherent bias and exclusion - an example being the success of a team, such as Port Adelaide, which has won 36 premierships in the SANFL, but that history is ignored because of the Victorian bias to only include premierships from the VFL.
I believe this page needs its standalone space to give some equity to what the competition is - national and inclusive
Thanks! Rudilouis (talk) 01:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AFL Era Statistics (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You, the creating editor, know what this is about. You have replied to a reviewer comment. Regrettably that still leaves me asking "What is this about?" thus the context is absent. The sourcing doesn't help the reader understand
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Timtrent
Thanks for your feedback, too. I'm truthfully unsure how much more succinct I can be - this competition (V/AFL) has evolved - with a particular nexus point being its adaptation from being state-based into nation-based. So far there is no central space to collate statistics for teams in the modern era. The historical era (pre-1990) excludes statistics from all other teams' histories if they did not participate in the VFL. Rudilouis (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AFL Era Statistics (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Itzcuauhtli11 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello Rudilouis! Your additions to Monomeith, Victoria have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AFL Era Statistics (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:
This draft appears to be a mix of original research and information not explicitly stated in sources. Unless reliable sources that are independent of the subject can be added to further explain this subject, this will be a large pile of original research.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]