Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Saad Lamjarred have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Saad Lamjarred was changed by Datamanager3000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960834 on 2025-01-26T06:15:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of tallest buildings in Africa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:06, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kick (service), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kick (service), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilyas El Maliki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilyas El Maliki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Badbluebus (talk) 03:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Datamanager3000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ilyas El Maliki, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Badbluebus (talk) 03:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Datamanager3000, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as IMDB12 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Badbluebus (talk) 03:46, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Datamanager3000. Do you have any relationship with @Hkatib? Badbluebus (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't. Datamanager3000 (talk) 04:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Datamanager3000. Do you own the rights of this image? You cannot just download images from facebook and upload it to Commons, that would result in it being deleted. Badbluebus (talk) 15:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Badbluebus Hello, I would like to say that I do not have any other account besides this one. If you find another account, please let me know or simply close it, as I have no connection to any account other than this one. i have just this : hkatib Hkatib (talk) 04:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ilyas El Maliki. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your feedback, but my intention was to present a neutral, factual summary of Ilyas El Maliki’s career based on reliable sources. The article includes both his achievements and controversies, which aligns with Wikipedia’s neutral point of view (WP:NPOV). If specific wording appears promotional, I’d be happy to adjust it. Could you clarify which parts seem to violate WP:PROMO so I can make the necessary improvements? Datamanager3000 (talk) 05:42, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some changes to ensure a more neutral tone. Let me know if you have any suggestions or if further adjustments are needed. Thanks! Datamanager3000 (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid euphemisms. Look at what sources are saying and summarize those sources without PR or spin. "Controversies" is vague and says nothing to readers. It's like you are trying to avoid saying anything unflattering about him. Wikipedia isn't a platform for PR or promotion. If the sources are worth citing to preserve the article, they are worth summarizing properly. Grayfell (talk) 05:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the need for clarity, but I'm not adding PR or spin—I’m summarizing what's in the sources. If you believe specific phrasing needs improvement, feel free to suggest an alternative rather than making vague accusations about intent. My goal is neutrality, and I’m open to refining the wording, but dismissing everything as PR without engaging in specifics isn’t productive. Datamanager3000 (talk) 06:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If reliable sources mention a "controversy", use those sources to explain what that controversy is. Just saying that a controversy exists without any context reads like reputation management, regardless of your intent. Grayfell (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ilyas El Maliki shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Badbluebus (talk) 20:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should use the talk page when disputes like this arise. Repeatedly removing the tags is not good behavior. Badbluebus (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MoroccanEd. Thank you. MimirIsSmart (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]