Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments. Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with civility and refrain from making personal attacks. Thank you.

If you believe another user to be violating Wikipedia policy, report them to the administrators. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at the history of the page to see who has been making the atttacks. Wikipedia has been rife with Spam over the years because, as has been often noted, "the loudest voice in the room wins".

What if, sometimes, the loudest voice in the rooms becomes the editors who remove the spam, instead of the ones putting all the crap in? 50.81.237.43 (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if you believe violations of policy to have taken place, make a report. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'll leave that up to you, since your now advocating for the Spam promotions to be left in. Please go on record with that. 50.81.237.43 (talk) 23:26, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content is not self-evidently spam. You have now been given an edit warring warning. Please do not try to restore your preferred version of the article again; either discuss the issue on the article talk page or make some kind of report. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:50.81.237.43 reported by User:AntiDionysius (Result: ). Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Magdeburg.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.