Your submission at Articles for creation: 1971–72 Yale Bulldogs men's basketball team (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
Continuing to resubmit without improvement will lead to rejection or deletion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 2603:6000:DC01:AC8C:C1A7:2429:2EDB:784B! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1972–73 Yale Bulldogs men's basketball team (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Non-notable season that fails WP:NSEASONS. We need to see significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. Directory and stats sites do nothing to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2603:6000:DC01:AC8C:C1A7:2429:2EDB:784B
No tags for this post.