|
I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you. Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content. I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions. To do list:
Add'l links
AB = Administrative BacklogsAdministrative backlogAIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism Administrator intervention against vandalism
ReportsUser-reported
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: Deletion backlog {{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 12 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection Usernames for administrator attention
User-reported
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection levelRequest protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 13:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism, recent edit-warring through IPs as well as a sockpuppet account Surayeproject3 (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet edits have returned. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of content that does not meet the inclusion criteria by IP-hopper. Sjö (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP disruptive and unsourced edits [[1]] Theonewithreason (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Virginia IPs Special:Contributions/198.24.31.113 and Special:Contributions/2001:579:A000:3D0:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 19:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism, though some IP edits are good faith. Entranced98 (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 20:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA, especially around monitoring human rights violations in the region. Thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 20:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 21:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Several IP editors have kept removing the statement that the island is prone to flooding - suspect it is the same editor as the IP's are mobile/cell codes. This is not the case and the Island has a flood evacuation plan with Castle Point Council and the Environment Agency, with the last flood occuring in 2014. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 22:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism and unconstructive edits lately. Anne drew (talk · contribs) 22:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive edits from IPs have continued since prior protection lapsed. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated unexplained deletion of sourced information by IP editors. DH85868993 (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 01:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Parksfan1955 (talk) 04:37, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent additions of undiscussed mass contents by IPs. – Garuda Talk! 10:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism in forms of blanking or altering wrong information, which even happened just today. 93.105.184.3 (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced birth date changes counter to existing cited source for DOB. Waxworker (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive edits by IP. Edits are a repeat of this serial sockpuppeteer. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 15:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic vandalism. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. PC failed. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 16:23, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive edits from IPs have persisted since protection lapsed. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continued vandalism. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting either a temporary semi-protection for this page, or a block of an IP being used for persistent edit warring on this page. Whichever one is more appropriate. — AFC Vixen 🦊 19:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warrior blowing up the infobox with far too many details, has been reverted by multiple users, has been asked to stop or use talkpage to reach consensus but nothing, just reverting over and over. Denniss (talk) 19:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:15, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:45, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism Retlinth (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. The prime minister of Portugal appears to be in some hot water. I think it says a lot about English-language media that I'm learning this from my watchlist, and not from the news. Unknown Temptation (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The article Roddy Ricch currently has no protection whatsoever. I was wondering if Semi-Protection could be placed on the page since the article seems to be well written, the article is a Biography of a Living Person, and the person was relatively popular back in 2020 and received various awards. Even similar pages such as King Von, Lil Durk, Lil Baby, and Lil Yachty have Semi-Protection. JustTryingToBeSmart (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The Seventh Day Slumber Wikipedia page has been repeatedly targeted by persistent vandalism, including deliberate misinformation and the manipulation of images to misrepresent the band’s reputation. The following disruptive edits have been ongoing: • Ongoing pattern of trolling – Despite multiple reversions of false edits, the vandalism persists, affecting the integrity of the page. • Misuse of images – A misleading photo from a smaller event was uploaded to intentionally misrepresent the band’s typical concert attendance. • Unverified changes to band history and lineup – Critical facts about the band’s background, discography, and personnel have been repeatedly modified without reliable sources. Given the pattern of disruptive behavior, I am requesting Semi-Protection or Extended Confirmed Protection to prevent further unauthorized and misleading edits. This will ensure that only autoconfirmed editors can modify the page, reducing vandalism while maintaining Wikipedia’s commitment to factual accuracy. Thank you for your consideration. Blaiseslumber (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced material with no article, which has gotten removed by other editors (including me recently) due to low notability. 1isall (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Current requests for reduction in protection levelRequest unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here. Current requests for edits to a protected pageRequest a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Handled requestsProtected edit requests
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled( · view requests)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection). I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
I have created 65 articles which are live, I understand the Wikipedia notability and other standards. I do create the articles of great quality. Hence request you to kindly grant the autopatrolled right, as the articles which I have been created are in pending for review state from long time, which demotivates me from creating new articles. Now a days, I'm mostly creating articles on Indian Villages. I have an experience of 11 years in Wikipedia, My articles are featured in DYK and ITN section of Wikipedia main page. I have worked with some of the Wikipedia admins and gained the knowledge. Searching our article and finding our Wikipedia page in the first result kept me motivating to add new articles to Wikipedia. Thanks in Advance. —Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
I've created 37 articles main JP-related articles. Seven including Huwie Ishizaki appeared in DYK. (Though, I only discovered DYK later in July), Huwie Ishizaki is both WP:GAN and on queue in DYK (will release tomorrow when I'm writing this). None of my articles are deleted all of them are well-sourced. My earlier stuffs are a bit short (e.g. Shōgo Yasukawa, Yoshinobu Yamakawa) and the earlier pages I created are stubs (N56 highway (Philippines), Urdaneta–Dagupan Road). In total, 6 of my articles are stubs. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
With over 45 live articles created, I believe that my experience on Wikipedia can positively contribute to patrol community. In addition, I believe that this right will also accord me more opportunity to grow. I hope i am given a chance. Thank you. Mevoelo (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
I came across this user while reviewing articles in NPP. They are an infrequent new article author, but have a clear understanding of notability and reliable sources, in addition to being a major contributor to several quality articles. A few sparse concerns about the use of copyrighted images were quickly corrected when notified, and they have been invited to NPP previously. Reconrabbit 18:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed( · view requests)
Alternative account of User:Sammi Brie being used for paid and other edits related to Arizona State University. Melted Brie (talk) 20:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Page mover( · view requests)
Hello! I meet the basic guidelines for the permission and I think that I have a good history of RM participation and it would be nice to try and help out with something new. I don't have much to say in my head but feel free to ask questions! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
I should grant page mover rights, after my previous proposal [3] does not meet requirements. Absolutiva (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer( · view requests)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. I would like to be able to confirm these requests as I think that it would just be another way for me to be helpful. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
I have been a active contributor to Wikipedia for quite a few months now, actively editing and creating articles related to Texas politicians. I'm also well aware about the Wikipedia policy on vandalism. I see a lot of requests on articles that I edit miscellaneously in my free time, however I don't have the permission. WormEater13 (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting Pending Changes Reviewer status so I can help speed up and decrease the number of pending changes to articles. I know the rules about vandalism, verifiability, editing guidelines, and everything else. Danoniinho (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request **Pending Changes Reviewer** rights. I have been an active editor since December 2020, with **1,094 total edits** (945 live). In the past year, I have made **345 edits**, primarily contributing to content creation, sourcing, and maintenance. I have created **154 articles** (121 currently live), ensuring compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. I am familiar with **WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,** and other core policies. I aim to help review pending changes on semi-protected pages to ensure accuracy and reliability. Thank you for your time and consideration! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I'm Stranger43286. I has made 1000+ edits and reverted many vandalism. I also known Wikipedia"s core policies (NPOV, WP:V and more). Pending changes reviewer rights might be helpful for me. RealStranger43286 (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I've been an active contributor to Wikipedia, focusing on improving article quality, maintaining neutrality, and adding reliable citations. I'm well versed in core policies (NPOV, Verifiability, NOR) and understand the importance of pending changes. As someone who values data integrity in open-access knowledge, I prioritize accuracy and well-sourced content. One of my objectives is to help keep Wikipedia factual and trustworthy. HerBauhaus (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm patrolling PendingChanges and RecentChanges on a regular basis. I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policies including (Verifiability, NPOV, BLP, OR, and also VAND - NOTVAND) and this right would help me to combat vandalism. I'm willing to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Ʀasteem Talk 04:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request pending changes reviewer so that I can help out with the review backlog. I'm active both at CopyPatrol and in recent changes patrolling, and familiar with the relevant policies regarding reviewing pending changes (Copyvio, potential BLP issues, legal threats, personal attacks, and libel). Tenshi! (Talk page) 01:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
I just think it'd be neat to take part in the process of reviewing pending changes! I have an understanding of good versus poor content, and gaining this right would be nice to exercise when I come across a needy page. BarntToust 01:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Rollback( · view requests)
There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. E6400 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I requested for this right a few weeks ago, which MusikBot will flag up. The reason I was declined was mainly because I had not met the 200 mainspace edit threshold needed for my application to go through. A concern was also raised about one of my edits, saying that I had jumped to conclusions about an editor a bit quickly and had gone too fast with the warnings. I am now trying to be better at using the warning system more fairly and helpfully and I hope that I have addressed this concern. Most of my edits on Wikipedia have been fighting against vandalism and with this tool, I will be able to fight it more efficiently. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting rollback rights to enhance my ability to fight vandalism. I Would like to try out AntiVandal tool. I'm a Mobile user, so Rollback will be very useful for me. I'm active in recent changes, pending changes, and new pages patrol, and I understand rollback is for clear vandalism cases. I'll use it responsibly. Here is my Undo/Revert History : [8] UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have made many reverts using undo and I use SWviewer/Twinkle to revert vandalism (see this to see my reverts). I understand the policies of rollback and have thoroughly read through the rollback policies and guidlines. I hope that I would receive the rights (permenant or for a probation period).— Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
I usually manual revert edits and undo revisions, particularly in Nepal-related articles, where vandalism is more common. Having rollback rights would help me efficiently maintain the accuracy and quality of these pages. WikiMentor01 (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been editing on Wikipedia since May 2024, and often times see IP accounts or newly created accounts cause disruption, vandalism or spread misinformation across vital articles. I have to manually revert their edits most of the times. Since I have been working on improving and expanding a few high exposure articles, I believe rollback rights would give me a large boost in handling vandalism. Swoonfed (Ping) 14:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Despite the fact that I took a somewhat lengthy Wikibreak, I've had over a month's experience of patrolling Recent Changes to combat vandalism. I have read WP:Rollback as well as have consistently notifying users of their reverted edits. I hope to use this tool so I can revert Vandalism more efficiently. With Thanks, Ghent123 Communicate 06:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I'll like to request for rollback rights. I have started patrolling recent changes since this year to remove any problematic edits. Having this tool can make the reverting process easier since it saves time consumption and therefore limits the chances of any accidental misclicks. Thanks. Galaxybeing (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Hey, am requesting the rollback rights mainly for reverting vandalism or unconstructive edits as i've read and understood that one can use the rollback but for reverting vandalism. Thanks, Would be glad if granted. – Raphael (B//C) 02:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
I want to request rollback right for me to counter the acts of vandalisms in Wikipedia. I have more than 200 mainspace edits, I have reviewed pending changes for more than a month, I never consciously participated in any edit wars and I try my best to notify the authors of edits reverted by me whenever possible. TrueMoriarty (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting the rights to fight Vandalism and use the Anti-vandal tool. I was declined last time as I had accidentally mistaken a level 4 warning to be 4im. I have also recieved a barnstar for the recent changes patrolling. Xiphoid Vigour ||⚔|⚔|| 09:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
FooterPolicies and links
Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.
I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are. |
Värsked postitused
- Siuru detailplaneeringule esitati ligi sada muudatusettepanekut
- Kohtunikuga sõnelenud Prantsusmaa suurklubi peatreener sai pika mängukeelu
- USA erisaadik selgitab suhete taastamist Venemaaga: vastasseis pole toimiv strateegia
- Anekdoot: venelastel on ikka väga kummaline huumorimeel!
- Maria Annus: see on tohutu väärtus, et töö koju kaasa tuleb
Most Used Categories
- Arhiiv (7,368)
- Muu (2,859)
- Uudiseid (735)
- Huumor (600)
- Kultuur (185)
- Meeldib.ee (41)
- Anekdoodid (41)
- Ajalugu (34)
You must be logged in to post a comment.