This page was last edited or modified by ClueBot III (talk · contribs · count · logs · email) on Wednesday 14:22:22 March 5, 2025 UTC.
Wikipedia:Babel | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 75 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
"Pregnant men" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Pregnant men has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 12 § Pregnant men until a consensus is reached. LIrala (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2024
- News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5
- Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited
- Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin
- In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial
- Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody
Orphaned non-free image File:Federation for American Immigration Reform.png

Thanks for uploading File:Federation for American Immigration Reform.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2024
- From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- Recent research: "Wikipedia editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Traffic report: Was a long and dark December
The Signpost: 15 January 2025
- From the editors: Looking back, looking forward
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024
- In the media: Will you be targeted?
- Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last
- Opinion: Reflections one score hence
- Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next
- Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics
- Humour: How to make friends on Wikipedia
Category:InfoWars people has been nominated for discussion

Category:InfoWars people has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Hot chips (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unambiguous
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
- Note that the article formerly at Hot Chips is now at Draft:Hot Chips (symposium). 162 etc. (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 February 2025
- Recent research: GPT-4 writes better edit summaries than human Wikipedians
- News and notes: Let's talk!
- Opinion: Fathoms Below, but over the moon
- Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5 has closed
- Traffic report: A wild drive
The Signpost: 27 February 2025
- Serendipity: Guinea-Bissau Heritage from Commons to the World
- Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year
- In the media: The end of the world
- Recent research: What's known about how readers navigate Wikipedia; Italian Wikipedia hardest to read
- Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing
- Tips and tricks: One year after this article is posted, will every single article on Wikipedia have a short description?
- Community view: Open letter from French Wikipedians says "no" to intimidation of volunteer contributors
- Traffic report: Temporary scars, February stars
Template:M
I was curious to see what was here (I'd expected it to be —). But I see it's an earthquake magnitude scale instead. I figured this was all well and good... but it was created in 2020? Was it really the case that in 2020 there was no template with that single-letter name?! I ask you because it says you're the one who created it. jp×g🗯️ 04:15, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- The template was created in 2004. Exactly because the name of the template is ambiguous and non-descriptive, it was moved to the present title, {{Earthquake magnitude}}, in 2020. {{M}} remains a redirect to the template in order to avoid breaking existing transclusions. feminist🩸 (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.