This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Military history: Maritime / North America / United States Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Shipwrecks This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Shipwreck-related priority open tasks: To Do Lady Elizabeth (1879) Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed! Improve grammar Add any additions if needed Still adding more information Discuss desired additions -None

@67.101.6.98: I reverted your recent edits because some of them were not constructive. Also, you've been reverting a bot that is specifically tasked to remove edits that link to certain websites. These sites are generally blacklisted because they fail WP:RS. If you want to re-add the external link to an image, then it should go at the bottom of the article, not the top. Mjroots (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A closer look would lead you conclude that the additions are backed boy legit refs/ 67.101.6.98 (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bot says otherwise. The issue is that the image is hosted at a website deemed unreliable. It may well be that the image is suitable, and there is a procedure to work round a blacklisted site in certain circumstances. As it's nearly my bedtime, I suggest that you wait and I'll take a proper look in the morning, probably in about 12 hours time due to off-wiki commitments. In the meantime, I will remove the link to the image (if you've not already been reverted). Mjroots (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait. The problem is that the Government of Portland, Oregon chose to publish images from its Archives and Records on WordPress.com. The bot should treat http://vintageportland.wordpress.com as an exception to its rule. 67.101.6.98 (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it may be possible to arrange that, or even use the image in the article. Definitely bedtime now! Mjroots (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@67.101.6.98: The procedure to get that website whitelisted is to file a request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. Take a look and let me know if you think you'd be able to do that (you'll be able to better explain the reasoning behind the request than I will. If you feel that you can't, I'll do it for you, but it would help if you gave an explantion once the request has been filed. Mjroots (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]