This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lady Gaga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lady Gaga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lady Gaga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lady GagaWikipedia:WikiProject Lady GagaTemplate:WikiProject Lady GagaLady Gaga Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• ... that Lady Gaga considered changing Mayhem into a grunge record after completing "Perfect Celebrity"?

• Reviewed:

Leafy46 (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems: - Article has notability issues

Overall: Article was created within 7 days of nomination. Article has over 1,500 characters. Article is properly cited. Earwig returned an unlikely copyright violation of 11.5%. A QPQ is not needed at this time. My only concern at this time is that the article is tagged with notability issues by RachelTensions. Once they have been resolved, I think it's good to go. lullabying (talk) 23:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @Lullabying: Thank you for the quick review! I've plead my case to RachelTensions over at my talk page about its notability, so I'll keep you posted as to when this gets resolved. Leafy46 (talk) 23:53, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• @Lullabying: I have added a few extra sources and consequently removed the notability template, reflected in this comment on the article's talk page. Hopefully this nomination should be good to go now?
  • @Lullabying: Whoops, forgot to sign. Leafy46 (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Good to go! lullabying (talk) 00:59, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article's sources do not yet reflect significant coverage of the song outside of the context of coverage of the album as a whole, or reviews of the project. See WP:NSONG for the specific guideline. "Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. RachelTensions (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI to anyone coming by, I've decided to remove this tag for the reason I've put in this comment on my talk page. I've added in a few of the extra sources I've found just to play it safe, but I'd argue that there were already a good amount of sources speaking specifically about the song before, and that there are definitely enough now. Leafy46 (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s fine with me. When I reviewed the article originally there was only one source cited that was actually on the song in-specific and not coverage of the album as a whole. Looks like things have expanded now.

RachelTensions (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]