Requested move 18 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 19:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Lynx → Iron Lynx / Iron Dames – Both teams have equal status and in the interest of equality, the name should reflect as such. 86.42.192.85 (talk) 23:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested split 24 November 2024

Please be aware there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Proposed article splits about splitting this article into separate ones for Iron Lynx and Iron Dames. Thank you. MSportWiki (talk) 23:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I support the split. Iron Dames have enough coverage to justify their own article. Rpo.castro (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the reasons outlined on the PAS page. 2001:8003:268E:A800:9DE5:6393:C64C:3D24 (talk) 08:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. During the 1812km of Qatar, the commentators said that Iron Dames is now its own team (not just a project of Iron Lynx which explains the moves to different manufacturers). Per their website, they are still owned by DC Racing Solutions, so they'd be the third pillar after Prema and Iron Lynx. Also, Iron Dames also do that horse riding thing of which I have no clue if that team is notable over there. FunkyMartian (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Iron_Lynx
No tags for this post.